Solution of some problems by collision probability methods
dc.contributor.author | Doherty, G | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-22T04:20:48Z | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-30T04:30:16Z | en_AU |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-22T04:20:48Z | en_AU |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-30T04:30:16Z | en_AU |
dc.date.issued | 1969-07 | en_AU |
dc.description.abstract | A comparison is made between isotropic collision probability and discrete Sn solutions to some one-dimensional neutron transport problems. Difficulties associated with the application of one or the other method in particular situations are discussed in detail. The Sn method is generally superior in cylindrical and spherical geometries and the collision probability method is recommended for slab geometry. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.citation | Doherty, G. (1969). Solution of some problems by collision probability methods. (AAEC/E199). Lucas Heights, NSW: Australian Atomic Energy Commission. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 210 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.other | AAEC-E-199 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.placeofpublication | Lucas Heights, New South Wales | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/383 | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en_au | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Australian Atomic Energy Commission | en_AU |
dc.subject | Neutron transport theory | en_AU |
dc.subject | Spherical configuration | en_AU |
dc.subject | Collision integrals | en_AU |
dc.subject | Cylindrical configuration | en_AU |
dc.title | Solution of some problems by collision probability methods | en_AU |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1