Comparing results of X-ray diffraction, µ-Raman spectroscopy and neutron diffraction when identifying chemical phases in seized nuclear material, during a comparative nuclear forensics exercise

dc.contributor.authorRondahl, SHen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPointurier, Fen_AU
dc.contributor.authorAhlinder, Len_AU
dc.contributor.authorRamebäck, Hen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMarie, Oen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRavat, Ben_AU
dc.contributor.authorDelauney, Fen_AU
dc.contributor.authorYoung, ELen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBlagojevic, Nen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHester, JRen_AU
dc.contributor.authorThorogood, GJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorNelwamondo, ANen_AU
dc.contributor.authorNtsoane, TPen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, SKen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHolliday, KSen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-21T05:26:44Zen_AU
dc.date.available2022-04-21T05:26:44Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2018-01-24en_AU
dc.date.statistics2022-03-31en_AU
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_AU
dc.description.abstractThis work presents the results for identification of chemical phases obtained by several laboratories as a part of an international nuclear forensic round-robin exercise. In this work powder X-ray diffraction (p-XRD) is regarded as the reference technique. Neutron diffraction produced a superior high-angle diffraction pattern relative to p-XRD. Requiring only small amounts of sample, µ-Raman spectroscopy was used for the first time in this context as a potentially complementary technique to p-XRD. The chemical phases were identified as pure UO2 in two materials, and as a mixture of UO2, U3O8 and an intermediate species U3O7 in the third material. © The Author(s) 2018. This article is an open access publication.en_AU
dc.identifier.citationRondahl, S. H., Pointurier, F., Ahlinder, L., Ramebäck, H., Marie, O., Ravat, B., Delauney, F., Young, E. L., Blagojevic, N., Hester, J. R., Thorogood, G. J., Nelwamondo, A. N., Ntsoane, T. P., Roberts, S. K. & Holliday, K. S. (2018). Comparing results of X-ray diffraction, µ-Raman spectroscopy and neutron diffraction when identifying chemical phases in seized nuclear material, during a comparative nuclear forensics exercise. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 315(2), 395-408. doi:10.1007/s10967-017-5666-3en_AU
dc.identifier.issn1588-2780en_AU
dc.identifier.issue2en_AU
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistryen_AU
dc.identifier.pagination395-408en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5666-3en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/13052en_AU
dc.identifier.volume315en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_AU
dc.subjectX-ray diffractionen_AU
dc.subjectNeutron diffractionen_AU
dc.subjectRaman spectroscopyen_AU
dc.subjectNuclear forensicsen_AU
dc.subjectUranium oxidesen_AU
dc.subjectComparative evaluationsen_AU
dc.titleComparing results of X-ray diffraction, µ-Raman spectroscopy and neutron diffraction when identifying chemical phases in seized nuclear material, during a comparative nuclear forensics exerciseen_AU
dc.typeJournal Articleen_AU
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rondahl2018_Article_ComparingResultsOfX-rayDiffrac.pdf
Size:
2.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10967_2017_5666_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Size:
840.18 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections