Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/10907
Title: Hydration mechanisms and proton conduction in the mixed ionic–electronic conductors Ba4Nb2O9 and Ba4Ta2O9
Authors: Wind, J
Mole, RA
Yu, DH
Avdeev, M
Ling, CD
Keywords: Oxygen
Energy
Molecular dynamics method
Hydration
Neutron diffraction
Electric conductors
Ionic conductivity
Issue Date: 12-Jul-2018
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Citation: Wind, J., Mole, R. A., Yu, D., Avdeev, M., & Ling, C. D. (2018). Hydration mechanisms and proton conduction in the mixed ionic–electronic conductors Ba4Nb2O9 and Ba4Ta2O9. Chemistry of Materials, 30(15), 4949-4958. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00950
Abstract: We studied the behavior of hydrogen in the mixed ionic–electronic conductors γ-Ba4Nb2O9 and 6H-Ba4Ta2O9 using a combination of experimental (neutron diffraction and inelastic neutron scattering) and computational (ab initio molecular dynamics) methods. Although these compounds have isostructural low-temperature polymorphs, they adopt distinct forms in the high-temperature conducting regime. We show here that they also have distinct mechanisms for hydration and ionic conduction. Hydration of γ-Ba4Nb2O9 is localized to 2-D layers in the structure that contain a 1:1 ratio of isolated but adjacent NbO4 and NbO5 polyhedra. OH– and H+ ions combine with two polyhedra, respectively, to form complete layers of NbO4OH polyhedra, giving rise to a stoichiometric hydrated form γ-III-Ba4Nb2O9·1/3H2O. Protons then diffuse through these 2-D layers by “hopping” between oxygen atoms on adjacent polyhedra. In the case of 6H-Ba4Ta2O9, hydration occurs by intercalating intact water molecules into the structure up to a maximum of ∼0.375 H2O per formula unit. This explains the unusual local and long-range structural distortions in the hydrated form observed by neutron diffraction. Diffusion then occurs by water molecules moving between neighboring symmetry equivalent positions. These fundamentally different hydration and proton conduction mechanisms explain why 6H-Ba4Ta2O9 has the less well-defined and higher maximum water content, while γ-Ba4Nb2O9 has the higher proton conductivity. © 2018 American Chemical Society
URI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00950
https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/10907
ISSN: 1520-5002
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.