Repository logo


Inelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphite

dc.contributor.authorIrman, Ken_AU
dc.contributor.authorFlores-Johnson, EAen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKruzic, JJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWindes, WEen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMarrow, TJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMuránsky, Oen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T03:48:09Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2025-06-15en_AU
dc.date.statistics2026-01-29en_AU
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding nuclear graphite's inelastic and fracture behaviour is essential for current and future reactor technologies using graphite-based engineering components. This study compares the behaviour of three nuclear graphite grades, fine-grained IG-110, coarse-grained NBG-18 and medium-grained PCEA, subjected to the uniaxial compression (UC) and the splitting tensile (ST) tests. It was found that the IG-110 graphite has a more favourable combination of ultimate strength and ductility when compared to the NBG-18 and PCEA grades containing large pores acting as strain concentrators. The formation of shear cracks was the primary failure mode under compression, while the formation of a main tension crack in the middle of the specimen was the primary failure mode during the ST test. The inelastic and fracture response was modelled using finite element simulations employing the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) material model with the dilation angle parameter value selected by two different optimisation processes; a decoupled optimisation was run on the UC and ST models separately, and a coupled optimisation was performed on the UC and ST models running simultaneously. The best predictions were obtained when the value from the coupled optimisation was used. The results showed that the CDP model accurately describes the inelastic behaviour and peak force of all graphite grades and could also capture the failure modes observed experimentally in both UC and ST tests. In particular, the numerical model could capture the crack initiation and propagation path observed in the ST test reasonably well for the IG-110 and PCEA graphite grades. Crown Copyright © 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open Access CC BY 4.0.en_AU
dc.identifier.articlenumber110339en_AU
dc.identifier.citationIrman, K., Flores-Johnson, E. A., Kruzic, J. J., Windes, W. E., Marrow, T. J., & Muránsky, O. (2025). Inelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphite. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 296, 110339. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110339en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0020-7403en_AU
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110339en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://apo.ansto.gov.au/handle/10238/17405en_AU
dc.identifier.volume296en_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.subjectGraphiteen_AU
dc.subjectTensile propertiesen_AU
dc.subjectTestingen_AU
dc.subjectConcretesen_AU
dc.subjectSimulationen_AU
dc.subjectOptimizationen_AU
dc.subjectFracture propertiesen_AU
dc.subjectFinite element methoden_AU
dc.subjectPlasticityen_AU
dc.titleInelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphiteen_AU
dc.typeJournal Articleen_AU

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Inelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphite.pdf
Size:
13.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.66 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections