Comparison of implantation and diffusion behavior of Ti, Sb and N in ion-implanted single crystal and polycrystalline ZnO: a SIMS study
dc.contributor.author | Lee, J | en_AU |
dc.contributor.author | Metson, J | en_AU |
dc.contributor.author | Evans, PJ | en_AU |
dc.contributor.author | Pal, U | en_AU |
dc.contributor.author | Bhattacharyya, D | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-19T06:41:32Z | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-30T05:08:44Z | en_AU |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-19T06:41:32Z | en_AU |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-30T05:08:44Z | en_AU |
dc.date.issued | 2010-01-15 | en_AU |
dc.date.statistics | 2010-01-15 | en_AU |
dc.description.abstract | Implantation and diffusion behavior of Sb, Ti and N in ZnO single crystal and sputter deposited thin films were studied through secondary ion mass spectrometric studies on ion-implanted and thermally annealed samples. Sb was implanted and Ti and N were co-implanted into ZnO single crystals and polycrystalline thin films on Si substrates at room temperature. The implanted samples were then annealed at 800°C. Depth profiles of implant distributions before and after annealing were examined by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS). As expected, implant range is sensitive to the mass of the dopants; and the dopant distribution is broadened as implanted elements migrate deeper into the film on thermal annealing. While diffusion of N in the ZnO thin film is not significant, Ti tends to diffuse deeper into the sample during annealing. For Ti and N co-implanted single crystal, annealing induced diffusion causes more redistribution of the lighter N than Ti. In general, implanted dopants diffuse more easily in thin films compared to the single crystal due to the presence of grain boundaries in the latter. © 2010, Elsevier Ltd. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.citation | Lee, J., Metson, J., Evans, P. J., Pal, U., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2010). Comparison of implantation and diffusion behavior of Ti, Sb and N in ion-implanted single crystal and polycrystalline ZnO: a SIMS study. Applied Surface Science, 256(7), 2143-2146. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.064 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 1562 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-4332 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Applied Surface Science | en_AU |
dc.identifier.pagination | 2143-2146 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.064 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/3213 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.volume | 256 | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_AU |
dc.subject | Monocrystals | en_AU |
dc.subject | Ion implantation | en_AU |
dc.subject | Mass spectroscopy | en_AU |
dc.subject | Ion microprobe analysis | en_AU |
dc.subject | Diffusion | en_AU |
dc.subject | Thin films | en_AU |
dc.title | Comparison of implantation and diffusion behavior of Ti, Sb and N in ion-implanted single crystal and polycrystalline ZnO: a SIMS study | en_AU |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_AU |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1