The case for a national medical cyclotron facility
dc.contributor.author | Smith, R | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-22T04:31:27Z | en_AU |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-30T04:40:48Z | en_AU |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-22T04:31:27Z | en_AU |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-30T04:40:48Z | en_AU |
dc.date.issued | 1984-12 | en_AU |
dc.description.abstract | Since cyclotrons and the associated equipment are complex and costly, it is unrealistic to expect that the Federal Government will fund more than one facility at the present time. Thus it appears obvious that this facility should be designed and used to achieve maximum national benefit. In this context the AAEC proposition is to install a dual-purpose cyclotron. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.citation | Smith, R. (1984). The case for a national medical cyclotron facility. (DR18). Lucas Heights, NSW: Australian Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 822 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.placeofpublication | Lucas Heights, New South Wales | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/812 | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en_au | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Australian Atomic Energy Commission | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | AAEC-DR-18 | en_AU |
dc.subject | AAEC | en_AU |
dc.subject | Cyclotron radiation | en_AU |
dc.subject | Hospitals | en_AU |
dc.subject | Radioisotopes | en_AU |
dc.subject | Nuclear medicine | en_AU |
dc.title | The case for a national medical cyclotron facility | en_AU |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1