Repository logo


Cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al sample preparation at the University of Wollongong

dc.contributor.authorCodilean, ATen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFülöp, RHen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWilcken, KMen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKoutamanis, DSen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFink, Den_AU
dc.contributor.authorFifield, LKen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWong, HJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorEnge, TGen_AU
dc.contributor.authorVardanega, CRen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRowling, Ben_AU
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-17T05:47:20Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2023-02en_AU
dc.date.statistics2026-02-18en_AU
dc.description.abstractThe University of Wollongong (UOW) cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al sample preparation laboratory has been in operation since the start of 2017. As primarily a feeder laboratory to ANSTO's Centre for Accelerator Science, our sample preparation procedures have been optimised with consideration to the setup of ANSTO's 6MV SIRIUS accelerator, and aim to achieve a balance between sample throughput as well as Be and Al target purity. A comparatively small number of samples (n = 68) have also been prepared for measurement at the Australian National University 14UD accelerator. 10Be/9Be ratios of procedural blanks measured on SIRIUS have fluctuated over time with the median for the year 2017 being 5.16 × 10−16 (IQR = 4.11 × 10−16 to 7.16 × 10−16, n = 18), increasing to 1.62 × 10−15 (IQR = 1.05 × 10−15 to 2.17 × 10−15, n = 31) for 2018 and 2019, a period coinciding with elevated boron levels in our samples, and finally decreasing to 1.15 × 10−15 (IQR = 8.63 × 10−16 to 1.60 × 10−15, n = 34) for 2020 and 2021. In contrast, 26Al/27Al ratios of procedural blanks measured on SIRIUS have shown a slight but continuous improvement over time with the median for 2017 of 1.70 × 10−15 (IQR = 8.19 × 10−16 to 5.25 × 10−15, n = 12) decreasing to 1.07 × 10−15 (IQR = 8.5 × 10−16 to 1.53 × 10−15, n = 13) for 2021. Median 10Be/9Be relative uncertainty of procedural blanks analysed on SIRIUS is 18 % (IQR = 15 % to 22 %; n = 86) whereas the median 26Al/27Al relative uncertainty of procedural blanks is higher at 60 % (IQR = 41 % to 100 %; n = 56), statistic resulting from most blanks yielding low 26Al counts (median = 2; IQR = 1–4.5). Average 9BeO− output relative to standard is between ∼ 70 % – 80 % for samples analysed on SIRIUS (n = 895) and ∼ 130 % for samples analysed at ANU (n = 68). 27Al− output relative to standard is lower for samples pressed into cathodes at UOW (∼60 %, n = 432) and analysed on SIRIUS than for those pressed at ANSTO (∼90 %, n = 119). Average 27Al− output relative to standard for samples analysed at ANU is ∼ 80 % (n = 62). 10Be and 26Al measurements of various laboratory intercomparison materials prepared at UOW between 2017 and 2022 yield results in agreement with consensus values confirming that our chemistry procedures are robust and in line with those elsewhere. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThe setup of the sample preparation laboratory and method development were supported by the University of Wollongong via numerous internal grants, including generous support from the GeoQuEST Research Centre. Cooperative research at ANSTO’s Centre for Accelerator Science (CAS) and ANU's Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF) was supported by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). ICP-MS and ICP-OES analyses at ANSTO were supported by the Isotope Tracing in Natural System (ITNS) research infrastructure through the ANSTO Research Portal (AP13590). We wish to acknowledge Henry Munack, Martin Struck, Marcello Blaxell, Anna Kudriavtseva, Jamie Glass, Matt Jeromson, Alessa J. Geiger, Emma Harrison, Toshiyuki Fujioka, Krista Simon, and Steven Kotevski who contributed to the data presented here, and Ryan North and Dominique Tanner for support with SEM measurements. We thank one anonymous reviewer for comments that greatly improved this work, and Darryl Granger for discussions. We acknowledge and pay respect to the traditional custodians of the land on which we live and work.en_AU
dc.identifier.citationCodilean, A. T., Fülöp, R.-H., Wilcken, K. M., Koutamanis, D. S., Fink, D., Fifield, L. K., Wong, H., Enge, T. G., Vardanega, C., & Rowling, B. (2023). Cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al sample preparation at the University of Wollongong. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 535, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2022.12.003en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0168-583Xen_AU
dc.identifier.journaltitleNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atomsen_AU
dc.identifier.pagination61-73en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2022.12.003en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://apo.ansto.gov.au/handle/10238/17380en_AU
dc.identifier.volume535en_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.subjectBeryllium 10en_AU
dc.subjectAluminiumen_AU
dc.subjectBerylliumen_AU
dc.subjectSamplersen_AU
dc.subjectAustraliaen_AU
dc.subjectANSTOen_AU
dc.subjectChemistryen_AU
dc.subjectAcceleratorsen_AU
dc.subjectLaboratoriesen_AU
dc.subjectCosmochemistryen_AU
dc.subjectBeryllium 10en_AU
dc.subjectAluminium 26en_AU
dc.subjectSample preparationen_AU
dc.titleCosmogenic 10Be and 26Al sample preparation at the University of Wollongongen_AU
dc.typeJournal Articleen_AU

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.66 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections