Comparison of the so-called CGR and NCR cathodes in commercial lithium-ion batteries using in situ neutron powder diffraction

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAlam, Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorHanley, TLen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPang, WKen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, VKen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Nen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-23T00:41:01Zen_AU
dc.date.available2022-12-23T00:41:01Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2014-12-18en_AU
dc.date.statistics2022-04-14en_AU
dc.description.abstractThe evolution of the 003 reflection of the layered Li(Ni,Co,Mn)O2 (CGR) and Li(Ni,Co,Al)O2 (NCR) cathodes in commercial 18650 lithium-ion batteries during charge/discharge were determined using in situ neutron powder diffraction. The 003 reflection is chosen as it is the stacking axis of the layered structure and shows the largest change during charge/discharge. The comparison between these two cathodes shows that the NCR cathode exhibits an unusual contraction near the charged state and during the potentiostatic step, where the potentiostatic step is recommended by the manufacturer. This feature is not shown to the same degree by the CGR cathode. The behavior is likely related to the compositions of these cathodes, the amount of Li/Ni site mixing and the presence of Al or Mn. © 2014 International Centre for Diffraction Data. Published by Cambridge University Pressen_AU
dc.identifier.citationAlam, M., Hanley, T., Pang, W., Peterson, V., & Sharma, N. (2014). Comparison of the so-called CGR and NCR cathodes in commercial lithium-ion batteries using in situ neutron powder diffraction. Paper presented to the Australian X-Ray Analytical Association (AXAA) Conference held February 9-13, 2014, Pan Pacific Hotel, Perth, WA. In Powder Diffraction, 29(S1), S35-S39. doi:10.1017/S088571561400102Xen_AU
dc.identifier.conferenceenddate13 February 2014en_AU
dc.identifier.conferencenameAustralian X-Ray Analytical Association (AXAA) Conferenceen_AU
dc.identifier.conferenceplacePerth, Western Australiaen_AU
dc.identifier.conferencestartdate9 February 2014en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0885-7156en_AU
dc.identifier.issueSupplement 1en_AU
dc.identifier.journaltitlePowder Diffractionen_AU
dc.identifier.paginationS35-S39en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/14252en_AU
dc.identifier.volume29en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_AU
dc.subjectLayersen_AU
dc.subjectLithiumen_AU
dc.subjectNickelen_AU
dc.subjectCobalten_AU
dc.subjectManganeseen_AU
dc.subjectElectric batteriesen_AU
dc.subjectLithium ion batteriesen_AU
dc.subjectDiffractionen_AU
dc.subjectCathodesen_AU
dc.titleComparison of the so-called CGR and NCR cathodes in commercial lithium-ion batteries using in situ neutron powder diffractionen_AU
dc.typeConference Paperen_AU
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
comparison-of-the-so-called-cgr-and-ncr-cathodes-in-commercial-lithium-ion-batteries-using-in-situ-neutron-powder-diffraction.pdf
Size:
462.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Conference Publications