Repository logo


Optimisation of monolithic nanocomposite and transparent ceramic scintillation detectors for positron emission tomography

dc.contributor.authorWilson, KJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorAlabd, Ren_AU
dc.contributor.authorAbolhasan, Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorSafavi-Naeini, Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorFranklin, DRen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T04:21:28Zen_AU
dc.date.available2025-01-13T04:21:28Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2020-12-01en_AU
dc.date.statistics2024-10-16en_AU
dc.description.abstractHigh-resolution arrays of discrete monocrystalline scintillators used for gamma photon coincidence detection in PET are costly and complex to fabricate, and exhibit intrinsically non-uniform sensitivity with respect to emission angle. Nanocomposites and transparent ceramics are two alternative classes of scintillator materials which can be formed into large monolithic structures, and which, when coupled to optical photodetector arrays, may offer a pathway to low cost, high-sensitivity, high-resolution PET. However, due to their high optical attenuation and scattering relative to monocrystalline scintillators, these materials exhibit an inherent trade-off between detection sensitivity and the number of scintillation photons which reach the optical photodetectors. In this work, a method for optimising scintillator thickness to maximise the probability of locating the point of interaction of 511 keV photons in a monolithic scintillator within a specified error bound is proposed and evaluated for five nanocomposite materials (LaBr3:Ce-polystyrene, Gd2O3-polyvinyl toluene, LaF3:Ce-polystyrene, LaF3:Ce-oleic acid and YAG:Ce-polystyrene) and four ceramics (GAGG:Ce, GLuGAG:Ce, GYGAG:Ce and LuAG:Pr). LaF3:Ce-polystyrene and GLuGAG:Ce were the best-performing nanocomposite and ceramic materials, respectively, with maximum sensitivities of 48.8% and 67.8% for 5 mm localisation accuracy with scintillator thicknesses of 42.6 mm and 27.5 mm, respectively. © The Author(s) 2020 - Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, the National Imaging Facility and the ARCLab facility at UTS.en_AU
dc.format.mediumElectronicen_AU
dc.identifier.articlenumber1409en_AU
dc.identifier.citationWilson, K. J., Alabd, R., Abolhasan, M., Safavi-Naeini, M., & Franklin, D. R. (2020). Optimisation of monolithic nanocomposite and transparent ceramic scintillation detectors for positron emission tomography. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1409. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58208-yen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322en_AU
dc.identifier.issue1en_AU
dc.identifier.journaltitleScientific Reportsen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58208-yen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://apo.ansto.gov.au/handle/10238/15930en_AU
dc.identifier.volume10en_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_AU
dc.subjectNanocompositesen_AU
dc.subjectScintillationsen_AU
dc.subjectCeramicsen_AU
dc.subjectTomographyen_AU
dc.subjectPositronsen_AU
dc.subjectEmissionen_AU
dc.subjectResolutionen_AU
dc.subjectPhotonsen_AU
dc.subjectSensitivityen_AU
dc.subjectPositron computed tomographyen_AU
dc.titleOptimisation of monolithic nanocomposite and transparent ceramic scintillation detectors for positron emission tomographyen_AU
dc.typeJournal Articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-17en_AU

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Optimisation of monolithic nanocomposite and transparent ceramic scintillation detectors for positron emission tomography.pdf
Size:
3.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
41598_2020_58208_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Size:
717.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.66 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections