Reply to Comment on “Uranium series dating of Great Artesian Basin travertine deposits: Implications for palaeohydrogeology and palaeoclimate” by Uysal et al. (2019).

dc.contributor.authorPriestley, SCen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKarlstrom, KEen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLove, AJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCrossey, LJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPolyak, VJen_AU
dc.contributor.authorAsmerom, Yen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMeredith, KTen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCrow, Ren_AU
dc.contributor.authorKeppel, MNen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHabermehl, MAen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T02:33:57Zen_AU
dc.date.available2023-01-13T02:33:57Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_AU
dc.date.statistics2022-11-14en_AU
dc.description.abstractTonguc Uysal and co-authors (this issue) propose that at least some of the U-series ages reported by Priestley et al. (2018) and Ring et al. (2016) provide minimum ages of movement at the Norwest Fault Zone in central Australia resulting from significant CO2 production due to mantle degassing related to active tectonics. We thank Tonguc Uysal and co-authors for their discussion on the role of tectonics and CO2 degassing in travertine precipitation and note that we had previously published (and agree with) the importance of mantle degassing as a source of CO2 that closely interacts with palaeohydrogeologic and palaeoclimatic forcings in explaining the rate and distribution of travertine deposition in the southwestern Great Artesian Basin (GAB) of central Australia. Based in part on western U.S. analogues (Crossey et al., 2016; Karlstrom et al., 2013a), we proposed and explored a model for these processes and their implications for the GAB in previous publications (Crossey et al., 2013; Karlstrom et al., 2013b) whereas Priestley et al. (2018) focused more specifically on palaeoclimate implications. Crown Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.Ven_AU
dc.identifier.articlenumber109421en_AU
dc.identifier.citationPriestley, S. C., Karlstrom, K. E., Love, A. J., Crossey, L. J., Polyak, V. J., Asmerom, Y., Meredith, K. T., Crow, R., Keppel, M. N., & Habermehl, M. A. (2020). Reply to Comment on "Uranium series dating of Great Artesian Basin travertine deposits: implications for palaeohydrogeology and palaeoclimate" by Uysal et al. (2019). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 537, 109421. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109421en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0031-0182en_AU
dc.identifier.journaltitlePalaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecologyen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109421en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/14349en_AU
dc.identifier.volume537en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.subjectTravertineen_AU
dc.subjectHydrologyen_AU
dc.subjectTectonicsen_AU
dc.subjectCarbon dioxideen_AU
dc.subjectPaleoclimatologyen_AU
dc.subjectEarth mantleen_AU
dc.subjectAustraliaen_AU
dc.titleReply to Comment on “Uranium series dating of Great Artesian Basin travertine deposits: Implications for palaeohydrogeology and palaeoclimate” by Uysal et al. (2019).en_AU
dc.typeJournal Articleen_AU
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0031018219308338-main.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections