Developing robust lake sediment chronologies using 210Pb, Pu and radiocarbon dating of pollen concentrates and macrofossil: a case study from Lake Surprise, Victoria, Australia
| dc.contributor.author | Dharmarathna, A | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Cadd, HR | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Barr, C | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Francke, A | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Hua, Q | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Child, DP | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Hotchkis, MAC | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Zawadzki, AW | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Gadd, PS | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Turney, CSM | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Marjo, CE | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Tibby, J | en_AU |
| dc.contributor.author | Tyler, JJ | en_AU |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-22T06:29:37Z | en_AU |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-08 | en_AU |
| dc.date.statistics | 2026-03-10 | en_AU |
| dc.description.abstract | The development of reliable sediment chronologies is crucial for accurate interpretations of decadal to century-scale palaeoenvironmental changes in the late Quaternary. Although radiocarbon dating of sedimentary sequences is commonly undertaken, not all the organic fractions are representative of atmospheric 14C levels, resulting in inaccurate age models. Whilst terrestrial plant macrofossils are widely considered ideal dating material – assuming they are contemporaneous with the horizons being dated – they are often sparse or absent. In this context, radiocarbon dating of pollen extracts is increasingly being used as alternative dating material. Here, we used pollen radiocarbon dating, alongside a suite of macrofossil and bulk sediment dates, to develop a chronology for the Holocene sediments of Lake Surprise, in Victoria, Australia. 210Pb activity and Plutonium (Pu) concentrations and isotope ratios were also analysed to constrain the age of the uppermost sediments, augmented with recent historical markers, including the first arrival of Pinus pollen and the date of an earlier coring expedition at the site in 2004. With respect to the radiocarbon dates, we found an age offset between the plant macrofossils and bulk sediment dates of 260 ± 86 14C years and an offset of ∼340 14C years between plant macrofossil and pollen extracts. In both cases, macrofossil dates appeared to be “younger” than the bulk sediment and pollen dates. The offset between pollen and plant macrofossil dates was found to vary with sediment depth and generally correlate with carbonate concentration in the sediment. Using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), we determined that the pollen extracts were not contaminated by either carbonate or charcoal. However, contamination by algal spores could not be ruled out, and we hypothesise that those algal spores may have assimilated aged dissolved inorganic carbon during periods of higher groundwater influx, thus altering the measured radiocarbon age of the pollen extract. Macrofossil and corrected pollen radiocarbon dates were incorporated in a Bayesian age-depth model which integrated 210Pb activities and Pu data and bomb pulse C-14 dates validated using recent historical age markers. Our results suggest that it is possible to generate a robust geochronological framework for Lake Surprise using radiocarbon dating back to at least ∼10,846 cal yr BP. © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Open Access CC BY 4.0. | en_AU |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was mainly supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery project (DP190102782). Acquisition of radiocarbon dates, radionuclide dates (210 Pb and Pu isotopes) and ITRAX core scanning were supported by an Australia's Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) grant (AP12406) awarded to Cameron Barr and by an Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AINSE) Ltd. Postgraduate Research Award to Asika Dharmarathna (ALNSTU12917). The authors acknowledge the Gunditj Mirring Traditional Owner Aboriginal Corporation and the Parks Victoria team for permission and their assistance in undertaking this work. The Authors would like to thank Bernd Zolitschka, Theodore Cadd, Alan Gontz, and Martin Ankor for their efforts in collecting sediment cores from Lake Surprise. Further, the Authors are grateful to laboratory technicians at the Centre for Accelerator Science, ANSTO, and the Mawson Analytical Spectrometry laboratory, University of Adelaide for their assistance in laboratory sample preparation and analyses. | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.articlenumber | 101686 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.citation | Dharmarathna, A., Cadd, H., Barr, C., Francke, A., Hua, Q., Child, D., Hotchkis, M., Zawadzki, A., Gadd, P., Turney, C., Marjo, C. E., Tibby, J., & Tyler, J. J. (2025). Developing robust lake sediment chronologies using 210Pb, Pu and radiocarbon dating of pollen concentrates and macrofossil: A case study from Lake Surprise, Victoria, Australia. Quaternary Geochronology, 89, 101686. doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2025.101686 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1871-1014 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.journaltitle | Quaternary Geochronology | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2025.101686 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://apo.ansto.gov.au/handle/10238/17274 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.volume | 89 | en_AU |
| dc.language | English | en_AU |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Lead | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Plutonium | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Lakes | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Australia | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Victoria | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Pollen | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Fossils | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Charcoal | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Spectroscopy | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Isotope dating | en_AU |
| dc.subject | Sediments | en_AU |
| dc.title | Developing robust lake sediment chronologies using 210Pb, Pu and radiocarbon dating of pollen concentrates and macrofossil: a case study from Lake Surprise, Victoria, Australia | en_AU |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_AU |