Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/9497
Title: Hydrological characterization of cave drip waters in a porous limestone: Golgotha Cave, Western Australia
Authors: Mohmud, K
Mariethoz, G
Baker, A
Treble, PC
Keywords: Hydrology
Caves
Limestone
Australia
Western Australia
Water
Porosity
Lithology
Issue Date: 6-Feb-2018
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Citation: Mahmud, K., Mariethoz, G., Baker, A., & Treble, P. C. (2018). Hydrological characterization of cave drip waters in a porous limestone: Golgotha Cave, Western Australia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22(2), 977-988. doi:10.5194/hess-22-977-2018
Abstract: Cave drip water response to surface meteorological conditions is complex due to the heterogeneity of water movement in the karst unsaturated zone. Previous studies have focused on the monitoring of fractured rock limestones that have little or no primary porosity. In this study, we aim to further understand infiltration water hydrology in the Tamala Limestone of SW Australia, which is Quaternary aeolianite with primary porosity. We build on our previous studies of the Golgotha Cave system and utilize the existing spatial survey of 29 automated cave drip loggers and a lidar-based flow classification scheme, conducted in the two main chambers of this cave. We find that a daily sampling frequency at our cave site optimizes the capture of drip variability with the least possible sampling artifacts. With the optimum sampling frequency, most of the drip sites show persistent autocorrelation for at least a month, typically much longer, indicating ample storage of water feeding all stalactites investigated. Drip discharge histograms are highly variable, showing sometimes multimodal distributions. Histogram skewness is shown to relate to the wetter-than-average 2013 hydrological year and modality is affected by seasonality. The hydrological classification scheme with respect to mean discharge and the flow variation can distinguish between groundwater flow types in limestones with primary porosity, and the technique could be used to characterize different karst flow paths when high-frequency automated drip logger data are available. We observe little difference in the coefficient of variation (COV) between flow classification types, probably reflecting the ample storage due to the dominance of primary porosity at this cave site. Moreover, we do not find any relationship between drip variability and discharge within similar flow type. Finally, a combination of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and clustering by k means is used to classify similar drip types based on time series analysis. This clustering reveals four unique drip regimes which agree with previous flow type classification for this site. It highlights a spatial homogeneity in drip types in one cave chamber, and spatial heterogeneity in the other, which is in agreement with our understanding of cave chamber morphology and lithology. © Author(s) 2018
Gov't Doc #: 9613
URI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-977-2018
http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/9497
ISSN: 1607-7938
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hess-22-977-2018-supplement.pdf675.69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
hess-22-977-2018.pdf7.16 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.