Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/564
Title: Comparison of costs of conventional fluorination and improved fluorox processes for the production of uranium hexafluoride
Authors: Charlton, BG
Keywords: Cost
Fluorination
Uranium
Uranium oxides U308
Issue Date: May-1975
Publisher: Australian Atomic Energy Commission
Citation: Charlton, B. G. (1975). Comparison of costs of conventional fluorination and improved fluorox processes for the production of uranium hexafluoride (AAEC/E358). Lucas Heights, NSW: Research Establishment, Australian Atomic Energy Commission.
Abstract: Capital and operating costs for direct fluorination and two schemes of improved Fluorox plants are compared for a uranium throughput of 3,000 Mg y-1. Scheme I involves the recycle of uranyl fluoride (UO2F2) through separate reduction and hydrofluorination steps, while in Scheme II the reduction and hydrofluorination of recycle UO2F2 is carried out in one step. There are savings in total capital requirement of approximately $982,000 for the Scheme I Fluorox plant and approximately $2,156,000 for the Scheme II Fluorox plant compared with a total capital requirement of approximately $14.6 x 106 for the conversion of yellow cake to uranium hexafluoride via direct fluorination. Annual expenditures (including capital charges) are reduced by $480,000 and $848,000 for the two Fluorox plants respectively, saving $0.16 kg-1 and $0.28 kg-1 respectively in the cost of conversion of yellow cake to uranium hexafluoride compared with $2.43 kg-1 reported for a direct fluorination plant.
Gov't Doc #: 574
URI: http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/564
Appears in Collections:Scientific and Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AAEC-E-358.pdf839.71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.