Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/4524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVeder, JP-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, K-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.contributor.authorAlam, MT-
dc.contributor.authorJames, M-
dc.contributor.authorNelson, A-
dc.contributor.authorDe Marco, R-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-15T02:57:42Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-15T02:57:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-11-26-
dc.identifier.citationVeder, J.-P., Patel, K., Lee, J., Alam, M. T, James, M., Nelson, A., De Marco, R. (2012). Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 15(5), 1364-1368. doi:10.1039/C2CP43333Hen_AU
dc.identifier.govdoc4910-
dc.identifier.issn1463-9076-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2CP43333Hen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/4524-
dc.description.abstractResistivities of thin polymer films increase abruptly with decreasing thickness, although the corresponding decline in resistance plateaus below a certain thickness. One can jump to the incorrect conclusion that quantum confinement and surface scattering are responsible for this behaviour, and we highlight the pitfalls of committing such an error. © 2012, Royal Society of Chemistryen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherRoyal Society Chemistryen_AU
dc.subjectIon-selective electrodesen_AU
dc.subjectPolymersen_AU
dc.subjectFilmsen_AU
dc.subjectThicknessen_AU
dc.subjectConfinementen_AU
dc.subjectScatteringen_AU
dc.titleIs ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films?en_AU
dc.typeJournal Articleen_AU
dc.date.statistics2013-03-15-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.