Browsing by Author "Uchida, S"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Radiological dose rates to marine fish from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident: the first three years across the North Pacific
    (American Chemical Society, 2014-12-22) Johansen, MP; Ruedig, E; Tagami, K; Uchida, S; Higley, K; Beresford, NA
    A more complete record is emerging of radionuclide measurements in fish tissue, sediment, and seawater samples from near the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) and across the Pacific Ocean. Our analysis of publicly available data indicates the dose rates to the most impacted fish species near the FDNPP (median 1.1 mGy d–1, 2012–2014 data) have remained above benchmark levels for potential dose effects at least three years longer than was indicated by previous, data-limited evaluations. Dose rates from 134,137Cs were highest in demersal species with sediment-associated food chains and feeding behaviors. In addition to 134,137Cs, the radionuclide 90Sr was estimated to contribute up to approximately one-half of the total 2013 dose rate to fish near the FDNPP. Mesopelagic fish 100–200 km east of the FDNPP, coastal fish in the Aleutian Islands (3300 km), and trans-Pacific migratory species all had increased dose rates as a consequence of the FDNPP accident, but their total dose rates remained dominated by background radionuclides. A hypothetical human consumer of 50 kg of fish, gathered 3 km from the FDNPP in 2013, would have received a total committed effective dose of approximately 0.95 mSv a–1 from combined FDNPP and ambient radionuclides, of which 0.13 mSv a–1 (14%) was solely from the FDNPP radionuclides and below the 1 mSv a–1 benchmark for public exposure. © 2014 American Chemical Society
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Recent development of wildlife transfer databases
    (International Union of Radioecology, 2014) Beresford, NA; Copplestone, D; Hosseini, A; Brown, JE; Johansen, MP; Hirth, GA; Sheppard, S; Dagher, E; Yankovich, T; Uchida, S; Napier, J; Outola, I; Wells, C; Barnett, CL; Wood, MD; Howard, BJ
    The transfer of radionuclides to wildlife in the environmental radiological assessment models developed over the last two decades is most often described by the whole organism concentration ratio (CRwo-media). This parameter relates whole organism activity concentrations to those in environmental media (typically soil for terrestrial ecosystems and water for aquatic ecosystems). When first released in 2007, the ERICA Tool contained the most comprehensive and well documented CRwo-media database available for wildlife. It was subsequently used in the US DOE RESRAD-BIOTA model and formed the initial basis for the international wildlife transfer database (WTD; www.wildlifetransferdatabase.org/?) developed to support IAEA and ICRP activities. Subsequently, many additional data were input to the WTD, including the outputs of a review of Russian language literature and data from Canadian monitoring programmes associated with nuclear power plants, U-mining and related industries. Summarised data from the WTD in 2011 were used to provide CRwo values in ICRP 114 and the IAEA's handbook on wildlife transfer parameters (http://www-ns.iaea.org/projects/emras/emras2/working-groups/working-group-five.asp?s=8&l=63). This paper provides an update on the development of the WTD subsequent to 2011 and its application to derive revised default CRwo-media parameter values of the ERICA Tool. Since 2011, some circa 17,000 additional CRwo-media values have been added to the WTD. The new inputs include original data for: representative species of the ICRPs Representative Animals and Plants (RAPs) from a UK forest; monitoring data from Japanese estuaries and Finland; Canadian wildlife; plutonium uptake data from US weapons testing programme sites; wild plants and invertebrates from north western USA; refereed literature published after 2011. Additionally, data already in the WTD from Australia were reviewed with reference to original source reports not previously considered and amended where required. The revised WTD was quality checked by considering the degree of variation in the data for each organism-element combination and the change between the WTD versions. This identified a number of errors (e.g. double entry of data, unit conversion errors and entries based on a dry matter rather than the required fresh weight basis) all of which have now been rectified. Statistical analyses of the WTD have demonstrated that there is currently no justification to subdivide CRwo-media from e.g. mammal to mammal herbivore and mammal carnivore etc.. In revising the ERICA Tool, a more generic categorisation of organisms has subsequently been used. Even with the increase in available data, there are still many radionuclide-organism combinations for which data are lacking. To provide default values where there are no data, a set of rules have been derived including the use of Bayesian statistics. (authors)
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Whole-body to tissue concentration ratios for use in biota dose assessments for animals
    (Springer, 2010-11) Yankovich, TL; Beresford, NA; Wood, MD; Aono, T; Andersson, P; Barnett, CL; Bennett, P; Brown, JE; Fesenko, S; Fesenko, J; Hosseini, A; Howard, BJ; Johansen, MP; Phaneuf, MM; Tagami, K; Takata, H; Twining, JR; Uchida, S
    Environmental monitoring programs often measure contaminant concentrations in animal tissues consumed by humans (e.g., muscle). By comparison, demonstration of the protection of biota from the potential effects of radionuclides involves a comparison of whole-body doses to radiological dose benchmarks. Consequently, methods for deriving whole-body concentration ratios based on tissue-specific data are required to make best use of the available information. This paper provides a series of look-up tables with whole-body:tissue-specific concentration ratios for non-human biota. Focus was placed on relatively broad animal categories (including molluscs, crustaceans, freshwater fishes, marine fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) and commonly measured tissues (specifically, bone, muscle, liver and kidney). Depending upon organism, whole-body to tissue concentration ratios were derived for between 12 and 47 elements. The whole-body to tissue concentration ratios can be used to estimate whole-body concentrations from tissue-specific measurements. However, we recommend that any given whole-body to tissue concentration ratio should not be used if the value falls between 0.75 and 1.5. Instead, a value of one should be assumed. © 2010, Springer.