ANSTO Publications Online >
Journal Publications >
Journal Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/8692

Title: Organ dose-rate calculations for small mammals at Maralinga, the Nevada test site, Hanford and Fukushima: A comparison of ellipsoidal and voxelized dosimetric methodologies
Authors: Caffrey, EA
Johansen, MP
Higley, KA
Keywords: RADIOLOGICAL DISPERSAL DEVICES
FUKUSHIMA-1 REACTOR
RADIOISOTOPES
ENERGY ABSORPTION
IRRADIATION
WILD ANIMALS
Issue Date: 28-Sep-2015
Publisher: BioOne
Citation: Caffrey, E. A., Johansen, M. P., & Higley, K. A. (2015). Organ Dose-Rate Calculations for Small Mammals at Maralinga, the Nevada Test Site, Hanford and Fukushima: A Comparison of Ellipsoidal and Voxelized Dosimetric Methodologies. Radiation Research, 184(4), 433-441. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR14162.1
Abstract: Radiological dosimetry for nonhuman biota typically relies on calculations that utilize the Monte Carlo simulations of simple, ellipsoidal geometries with internal radioactivity distributed homogeneously throughout. In this manner it is quick and easy to estimate whole-body dose rates to biota. Voxel models are detailed anatomical phantoms that were first used for calculating radiation dose to humans, which are now being extended to nonhuman biota dose calculations. However, if simple ellipsoidal models provide conservative dose-rate estimates, then the additional labor involved in creating voxel models may be unnecessary for most scenarios. Here we show that the ellipsoidal method provides conservative estimates of organ dose rates to small mammals. Organ dose rates were calculated for environmental source terms from Maralinga, the Nevada Test Site, Hanford and Fukushima using both the ellipsoidal and voxel techniques, and in all cases the ellipsoidal method yielded more conservative dose rates by factors of 1.2–1.4 for photons and 5.3 for beta particles. Dose rates for alpha-emitting radionuclides are identical for each method as full energy absorption in source tissue is assumed. The voxel procedure includes contributions to dose from organ-to-organ irradiation (shown here to comprise 2–50% of total dose from photons and 0–93% of total dose from beta particles) that is not specifically quantified in the ellipsoidal approach. Overall, the voxel models provide robust dosimetry for the nonhuman mammals considered in this study, and though the level of detail is likely extraneous to demonstrating regulatory compliance today, voxel models may nevertheless be advantageous in resolving ongoing questions regarding the effects of ionizing radiation on wildlife.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR14162.1
http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/8692
ISSN: 1938-5404
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in APO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback