ANSTO Publications Online >
Journal Publications >
Journal Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/8501

Title: Response of thin-skinned sandwich panels to contact loading with flat-ended cylindrical punches: Experiments, numerical simulations and neutron diffraction measurements.
Authors: Saleh, M
Luzin, V
Toppler, K
Kabir, K
Keywords: MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
MECHANICAL TESTS
NEUTRON DIFFRACTION
ALUMINIUM
FRACTURING
Issue Date: 1-Sep-2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Saleh, Michael, Luzin, Vladimir, Toppler, Karl, & Kabir, Kaveh. (2015). Response of thin-skinned sandwich panels to contact loading with flat-ended cylindrical punches: Experiments, numerical simulations and neutron diffraction measurements. Composites Part B: Engineering, 78, 415-430.
Abstract: The response of aluminium foam-cored sandwich panels to localised contact loading was investigated experimentally and numerically using flat-ended cylindrical punch of four varying sizes. ALPORAS and ALULIGHT closed-cell foams of 15 mm thickness with 0.3 mm thick aluminium face sheets (of 236 MPa yield strength) were used to manufacture the sandwich panels. Face sheet fracturing at the perimeter of the indenter, in addition to foam cells collapse beneath the indenter and tearing of the cell walls at the perimeter of the indenter were the major failure mechanisms of the sandwich panels, irrespective of the strength and density of the underlying foam core. The authors employed a 3D model in ABAQUS/Explicit to evaluate the indentation event, the skin failure of the face sheets and carry out a sensitivity study of the panel's response. Using the foam model of Deshpande and Fleck combined with the forming limit diagram (FLD) of the aluminium face sheet, good quantitative and qualitative correlations between experiments and simulations were achieved. The higher plastic compliance of the ALPORAS led to increased bending of the sheet metal and delayed the onset of sheet necking and failure. ALULIGHT-cored panels exhibited higher load bearing and energy absorption capacity, compared with ALPORAS cores, due to their higher foam and cell densities and higher yield strength of the cell walls. Additionally, they exhibited greater propensity for strain hardening as evidenced by mechanical testing and the neutron diffraction measurements, which demonstrated the development of macroscopically measurable stresses at higher strains. At these conditions the ALULIGHT response upon compaction becomes akin to the response of bulk material with measurable elastic modulus and evident Poisson effect. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.001
http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/8501
ISSN: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.001
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in APO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback