ANSTO Publications Online >
Journal Publications >
Journal Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/2861

Title: Whole-body to tissue concentration ratios for use in biota dose assessments for animals.
Authors: Yankovich, TL
Beresford, NA
Wood, MD
Aono, T
Andersson, P
Barnett, CL
Bennett, P
Brown, JE
Fesenko, S
Fesenko, J
Hosseini, A
Howard, BJ
Johansen, MP
Phaneuf, MM
Tagami, K
Takata, H
Twining, JR
Uchida, S
Keywords: Animal Tissues
Whole-Body Counters
Consumption Rates
Contamination
Concentration Ratio
Radioisotopes
Issue Date: Nov-2010
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Yankovich, T. L., Beresford, N. A., Wood, M. D., Aono, T., Andersson, P., Barnett, C. L., et al. (2010). Whole-body to tissue concentration ratios for use in biota dose assessments for animals. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 49(4), 549-565.
Abstract: Environmental monitoring programs often measure contaminant concentrations in animal tissues consumed by humans (e.g., muscle). By comparison, demonstration of the protection of biota from the potential effects of radionuclides involves a comparison of whole-body doses to radiological dose benchmarks. Consequently, methods for deriving whole-body concentration ratios based on tissue-specific data are required to make best use of the available information. This paper provides a series of look-up tables with whole-body:tissue-specific concentration ratios for non-human biota. Focus was placed on relatively broad animal categories (including molluscs, crustaceans, freshwater fishes, marine fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) and commonly measured tissues (specifically, bone, muscle, liver and kidney). Depending upon organism, whole-body to tissue concentration ratios were derived for between 12 and 47 elements. The whole-body to tissue concentration ratios can be used to estimate whole-body concentrations from tissue-specific measurements. However, we recommend that any given whole-body to tissue concentration ratio should not be used if the value falls between 0.75 and 1.5. Instead, a value of one should be assumed. © 2010, Springer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Description: This paper is based on a presentation made at the second meeting of the Wildlife Transfer Coefficient Handbook Working Group of the IAEA EMRAS II programme (held at the IAEA, Vienna, 22–24 July 2009).
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-010-0323-z
http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/2861
ISSN: 0301-634X
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in APO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback