Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558 lable at ScienceDirectContents lists avaiJournal of Environmental Radioactivity journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/ jenvradBiotic, temporal and spatial variability of tritium concentrations in transpirate samples collected in the vicinity of a near-surface low-level nuclear waste disposal site and nearby research reactor J.R. Twining*, C.E. Hughes, J.J. Harrison, S. Hankin, J. Crawford, M. Johansen, L. Dyer Institute for Environmental Research, ANSTO, Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC, NSW 2232, Australiaa r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 10 November 2010 Received in revised form 18 February 2011 Accepted 18 February 2011 Available online 12 March 2011 Keywords: Tritium Transpiration Correlation modelling Groundwater Leachate* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ612 97173060; fax: E-mail address: jrt@ansto.gov.au (J.R. Twining). 0265-931X/$ e see front matter Crown Copyright  doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.02.012a b s t r a c t The results of a 21 month sampling program measuring tritium in tree transpirate with respect to local sources are reported. The aim was to assess the potential of tree transpirate to indicate the presence of sub-surface seepage plumes. Transpirate gathered from trees near low-level nuclear waste disposal trenches contained activity concentrations of 3H that were significantly higher (up to w700 Bq L1) than local background levels (0e10 Bq L1). The effects of the waste source declined rapidly with distance to be at background levels within 10s of metres. A research reactor 1.6 km south of the site contributed significant (p < 0.01) local fallout 3H but its influence did not reach as far as the disposal trenches. The elevated 3H levels in transpirate were, however, substantially lower than groundwater concen- trations measured across the site (ranging from 0 to 91% with a median of 2%). Temporal patterns of tree transpirate 3H, together with local meteorological observations, indicate that soil water within the active root zones comprised a mixture of seepage and rainfall infiltration. The degree of mixing was variable given that the soil water activity concentrations were heterogeneous at a scale equivalent to the effective rooting volume of the trees. In addition, water taken up by roots was not well mixed within the trees. Based on correlation modelling, net rainfall less evaporation (a surrogate for infiltration) over a period of from 2 to 3 weeks prior to sampling seems to be the optimum predictor of transpirate 3H variability for any sampled tree at this site. The results demonstrate successful use of 3H in transpirate from trees to indicate the presence and general extent of sub-surface contamination at a low-level nuclear waste site. Crown Copyright  2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.1. Introduction and aim The Little Forest Burial Ground (LFBG) is a legacy, near-surface, waste disposal site located at Lucas Heights near the old HIgh Flux Australian Reactor (HIFAR, Fig. 1) in southern Sydney. Both the LFBG (via groundwater) and HIFAR (via atmospheric dispersal) are potential sources of tritium (3H) to the nearby environment. Disposal operations at the LFBG took place from 1960 to 1968 (Isaacs and Mears, 1977) and 3H comprised part of the waste. Since then, the site has been regularly maintained and routine moni- toring of groundwater, grass and high volume air sampling, as reported in annual ANSTO Environmental Monitoring reports (e.g. Hoffmann et al., 2008), has continued to the present day. Recentlyþ612 97173599. 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Allinitiated studies at the site have been more intensive than the routine work and have been directed towards better under- standing, and modelling of, the behaviour of radioactive materials under Australian conditions as well as to assess management options for the site. Aspects of the improved modelling will hope- fully be transferrable to other Australian sites, such as the proposed national nuclear waste storage facility under consideration. At any waste site, one of the key issues is the potential hazard to humans or other species that may arise due to the movement of radionuclides through the environment to potential receptors. It is therefore necessary to understand the environmental pathways which may lead to such exposures, which usually include the possibility of movement of radionuclides in groundwaters through the vicinity of the site. It was believed that trees at the LFBG had the potential to intersect any sub-surface dispersion plumes from the buried waste, thereby providing a more expansive spatial coverage than the existing set of bores at the site and allowing sampling overrights reserved. 552 J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558 Fig. 1. The Little Forest Burial Ground and nearby HIFAR research reactor. A, Location map and sampling sites for long, NS transect; B, Aerial view of LFBG showing locations of sampled trees comprising standard set and nearby transects.the waste without otherwise disturbing it. Tritiated water, being a conservative tracer of such a plume, would be taken up by plants and transpired. The soilerooteleaf pathway was identified as the major transport mechanism for 3H from contaminated ground- water by Evenden et al. (1998). Thus, this radioecological study was instigated in 2007 to assess that potential. Since that time, there has also been an increasing emphasis placed on the need to undertake environmental dose assessment of nuclear activities (e.g. ICRP 108, 2008). This paper will report on the findings of a 21 month survey of transpirate 3H over, and adjacent to, the trenches and with respect to the other local 3H source, HIFAR. Whilst 3H itself is not of undue concern from a radiological perspective, particularly at the levels measured in this investiga- tion, these results will be used to identify the trees which have substantial access to any waste seepage plume. Those trees will be targeted for additional tissue analyses for other radionuclides to assess their relative transport rates in the plume as well as their bioaccumulation rates for dose assessment modelling purposes.2. Materials and methods 2.1. Site description At the LFBG, a variety of low-level nuclear waste materials were disposed of in a series of 77 unlined trenchesw3m deep, 25m long and spaced 2.7 m apart. As each trench was filled, it was re-covered with topsoil to a depth of w1.0 m. There was a total of 1675 m3 of waste, comprising w150 GBq of activity and including 1730 kg of beryllium (Isaacs and Mears, 1977). The locations of trenches are still evident from minor surface subsidence at the present day (Fig. 1b). The local geology, described by Hughes et al. (2010), consists of topsoil and clay to a depth of 1.5e2 m, which is derived from weathered shale to a depth of approximately 6e8 m. The shale overlies the Hawkesbury Sandstone which extends to a depth of around 200 m. Surrounding the trenches, a perched saturated zone exists near the top of the weathered shale at w3 m. This saturated zone is hypothesised to be fed by leachate from the LFBG trenches. Below this level other perched saturated zones have been observed, with the main aquifer occurring in the Hawkesbury Sandstone. 2.2. Sampling A variety of approaches were assessed to determine the best methods for sampling and analysis of 3H in transpirate. More detailed descriptions of those techniques are available in Twining et al. (2009). The following is a synopsis of the optimal method- ology applied over the period. 2.2.1. Biota selection Seven accessible trees and shrubs over, or adjacent to, the trenches were identified as being most likely to intersect any sub- surface seepage plumes. These plants, comprising a gum tree (Eucalyptus paniculata; Eu 1), two similar Acacia sp (Ac 1, Acacia obtusifolia and Ac 2, Acacia longifolia longifolia), two turpentine trees (Syncarpia glomulifera; Sy 1 and 2), a Leptospermum poly- galifolium shrub (Le 1) and a Banksia serrata tree (Ba 1) are identi- fied in Fig. 1b and are hereafter referred to as the standard set. Typical rooting depths for these species are not well established, particularly for this site; however the following values are esti- mates provided from the scientific literature. In schlerophyllous scrub and forest in south eastern Australia the range of maximum rooting depths for Banksia spp and a Leptospermum sp. is 2.3e2.5 m (Canadell et al., 1996, citing Specht and Rayson, 1957). McColl (1969) reported an average rooting depth of just 1.2 m for E. paniculata based on observations of soil profiles in a coastal forest south of Sydney. No information on the rooting depths of the Acacia spp nor of the Syncarpia sp. in this study is otherwise available, although Canadell et al. (1996, Fig. 2 therein) provided an estimated mean maximum rooting depth for trees of 6.9  1.2 m and for shrubs of 5.0  0.9. Average rooting depths will be somewhat less than the maxima and it should be recognised that local soil conditions will also constrain plant growth. Initial samples of transpirate were collected in Jul 2007. Subse- quent sets of samples using the same trees and as far as possible the same branches, were collected approximately every three months until Mar 2009. In Oct 2007, samples were collected from more branches on the trees identified as Ba 1, Sy 1 and Ac 2 (Fig. 1b) to better estimate variability within these trees. In addition, three transects of approximately 400 m length located adjacent to the trenches were sampled on or about 13 Mar 2008 (West); 24 Jun 2008 (North) and 30 Sep 2008 (South East) (Fig. 1b). A fourth, much longer transect (w15 km) beginning at the HIFAR reactor which is approximately 1.6 km south of the LFBG, then running northward J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558 553 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 Branch no. Fig. 2. Tritium activity concentrations in transpirate collected from 5 branches on each of 3 trees [Ac 1 (dotted), Ba 1 (dashed) and Sy 1 (solid line) refer to Section 2.2.1 for sample details] on 4 October 2007. Analytical errors (1 s.d.) are also shown. 3 T ra n sp i ra t e H (B q / L ) through the LFBG and beyond (Fig. 1a) was sampled on 30 Sep 2008 and 23 Mar 2009. Plants sampled in these transects comprised Eucalyptus; Syncarpia and Acacia spp. 2.2.2. Collection of transpirate The leaves at the distal end of a limb (in the case of trees or large shrubs) or limbs (in the case of smaller shrubs) were enclosed in a large, dry, clean, clear PVC bag with the open end being taped closed around the branch (or branches) using adhesive cloth tape. The bag was typically placed on a north-facing (sun-exposed) limb, on sunny days after dew evaporation, for four or more hours. The condensate in the bag was collected with new, 50 mL disposable syringes. The samples were filtered in situ using dual stage, 1.0 and 0.45 mm polypropylene membrane cartridges, into clean, dry, HDPE plastic bottles. Volumes from 0 to >250 mL (typical range 50e150 mL) were collected over the entire period with smaller volumes collected on cooler, more overcast days. The filtered samples were returned to ANSTO and placed into a cool room to await further processing. 2.2.3. Sample processing From the filtered transpirates, 25mL aliquots were processed for 3H analysis using Eichrom tritium columns (Eichrom, 1996) to remove dissolved organics (including organically-bound 3H) and ions. After treatment, 5 mL of each sample was added to trans- lucent, HDPE scintillation vials with 11 mL of Ultima Gold uLLT liquid scintillant cocktail and the vials were sealed for counting. A similar procedure was used to prepare standards and blanks to be included in each counting run. 2.3. Analysis Samples, with blanks (distilled ‘dead’ water acquired from an aquifer with no bomb pulse 3H) and standards (prepared using Amersham TRY64, batch 133, 1 Nov 2002), were counted on a Packard Tricarb 2900TR LSC using up to 31  20 min cycles over an energy range from 2 to 18.6 keV. Detection efficiencies were approximately 25% with a detection limit of w10 Bq L1. Quench correction used instrument TSIE values and a correction curve derived from a set of 10 standard samples quenched with increasing amounts of food dye. The 3H activity in each sample was determined using total counts, after background subtraction and accounting for within-run efficiency (standards) and quenching (TSIE). Measurement uncertainties quoted in this study include counting, weighing and standard activity uncertainties.2.4. Additional data Meteorology observations form part of the routine monitoring program carried out at ANSTO. A range of variables are collected at frequencies up to every 15 min from the Lucas Heights meteoro- logical station (Clark, 2003) approximately 1.6 km south from the LFBG. Daily averages of temperature, rainfall and pan evaporation were used to help interpret the variability in transpirate 3H over time. Similarly, routine water samples have been regularly collected and analysed for a range of contaminants, including 3H, from boreholes across the LFBG and rainfall from the meteorological station (Hughes et al., 2010). In addition, water samples were gathered from series of shallow (3e5 m) core holes immediately after drilling near the trenches in Aug 2009.These results were used to assist interpretation of the spatial variability observed in the transpirate 3H data. 3. Results and discussion The full set of results for 3H in transpirate at LFBG is available from the records at ANSTO via the first author. The results reported here- after are subsets or averages relevant to the hypotheses being assessed ineachcase. All further references to 3H in transpirate, soil or groundwater at this site refer to non-organically-bound 3H inwater. 3.1. Within-tree variability Results for 3H in transpirate collected on 4 Oct 2007 from 5 different branches on each of 3 trees (Ac 2; Ba 1 and Sy 1) are shown in Fig. 2. The measurement uncertainties are generally within the symbol of each datum. Hence, it can readily be seen that there were significant (p < 0.01) differences in 3H being measured from different branches within any tree. The absolute differences between trees will be discussed below. Variability was greater in Ac 2 than in Ba 1whichwas similar to Sy 1. The trees increased in size in that same order, so it may be that this patternwas related to rooting depth. However, rooting depth was not recorded to confirm this. It is clear that the trees were all exhibiting different 3H levels in different branches. This observation points to two related factors. Firstly, the roots were accessing different concentrations of 3H in the soil (i.e. heterogeneous sources) and secondly, there was limited mixing occurring within the trees once water was taken up by the roots. Regarding small scale variability at field sites, Amano and Garten (1991) encountered very heterogeneous soil water 3H concentra- tions at a site adjacent to the Oak River National Laboratory in the USA. They relied on integration within the plant to assess average soil water concentrations for their modelling. Combining several leaf samples to provide a soil water value for their modelling may have been sufficient to overcome the variability identified in that study. Modellers within the IAEA BIOMASS Program also agreed that 3H concentrations in soils at sites with sub-surface contami- nation can vary sharply over short distances (IAEA, 2003). From that, good predictions of 3H transport required sophisticated models and detailed information on meteorological conditions and soil characteristics unless the models were generalised over larger areas. The limited mixing of 3H within tree water streams was not unexpected and similar disparities had been observed for tritiated water uptake in another Australian species (Twining, 1994). Xylem tissues are themain conductive vessels carryingwater from roots to leaves for photosynthesis. Studies carried out in the rainforests of the Amazon (Jordan and Kline, 1977) and in coniferous areas of north-western USA (Kline et al., 1976) conclusively showed that the 554 J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558rateof transpiration ineither environmentwasdirectlyproportional to the sapwood cross-sectional area, and hence to the amount of xylem tissue present. These vascular tissues need to be highly conductive and yet with reduced lateral porosity to allow for water to be drawn vertically over substantial distances. In support of reduced horizontal mixing, Mathew et al. (1988) injected tritiated water into a number of holes bored into the base of a 2.5mpalm tree and thenobserved the appearance of 3H in the leaves at the crownby sampling leaflets over time (the water was collected by vacuum freeze-drying and hence did not include any organically-bound 3H). They found that the 3H peak arrival varied from w5.5e9 days in different leaves, almost twice the time fromone branch to the other. This indicated that some flowpathsweremore tortuous than others but also that those paths were essentially discrete. Evidence for some horizontal mixing does exist, however. Kline et al. (1976) undertook a similar study in which tritiated water was injected into holes near the base of Douglas fir trees. The vertical and horizontal movement of 3H after 10 days was assessed by taking cores into the pith of the tree at 20, 30, 40 and 50 m heights above the injection point. As expected, these showed the most rapid vertical movement occurred towards the inner parts of the cortex (sapwood) where the xylem predominates. Most of the 3H was at 40 m but a peak was starting to become apparent at 50 m. However some was also detected in the pith (heartwood). The pattern in this case suggested that 3Hmoved horizontally out of the xylem and into the pith during the passage of the peak activity but then moved back into the xylem after the peak had passed. There was little or no evidence of vertical movement within the pith. None of these studies measured organically-bound 3H. 3.2. Temporal variability in transpirate tritium activity concentrations Variability in average transpirate 3H over the entire sampling period for the standard set of trees is shown in Fig. 3. The values for each time period weremostly significantly different (p< 0.01) from the previous datum for each branch, although the degree of change was variable. The marked differences on 4 Oct 2007 were, to some degree, due to the sampling of multiple branches on some trees that day, as discussed earlier. Apart from that excursion, most of the trees retained a similar degree of activity concentration in tran- spirate over time despite the significant differences between each sample. For example, Sy 1 always had higher average 3H activity concentrations than did Le 1, which in turn always had more than Ba 1 and similarly for Ac 1. This pointed to heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of 3H in the soil profile, as indicated previously by the heterogeneity observed between branches and as will be discussed further below. It also indicated that the soil 3H levels atAc 1 Ac 2 Ba Fig. 3. Average 3H activity concentration in transpirate from each tree (see Section 2.2.1 fo indicates that a different branch was selected and sampled after July 2007. Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08any one location remained generally consistent over time. At a similar site to the LFBG, near the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Waste Storage Area, Amano and Garten (1991, citing Amano et al. 1987) reported that the change in soil 3H concentrations was fairly slow, as reflected in our data. There was also a tendency for the trees to follow a similar trend from one date to the next, with most trees either increasing or decreasing their average activity concentration simultaneously. This suggested that environmental factors were having some influence across the site, the most obvious being rainfall which will tend to dilute the 3H activity concentrations in the surface soils as well as in the trenches (assuming that the trenches are the major source of 3H in this location). Amano and Garten (1992) showed surface dilution leading to reduced 3Hvalues in the top10 cmof the soil profile at the Oak Ridge site over both summer and winter compared to consis- tently higher activity concentrations for the next 70 cm. At LFBG, infiltration into the clay soils below the topsoil zone is believed to be slow. However, evidence suggests that the poorly capped trenches provide a preferentialflowpathwayallowing rainfall to dilute the 3H in the trenches. The resulting saturated layer, observed at a depth of 2.5e3.5 m, may therefore have 3H activity concentrations that also vary in response to rainfall. The effect of rainfall is not only to dilute the surface soil 3H. Plants can also respond to changingwater potential by altering their active root zone, i.e. the depth at which they obtain their water, to access water at energetically more favourable levels (Guswa, 2008 and citations within). This is a physiological response to access water that requires less effort to adsorb and transpire. Over an annual cycle, Stringer et al. (1989) studiedoaks onahillside inKentucky that was also affected by lateral groundwater 3flow of H from the nearby low-levelwaste repositoryatMaxeyFlats. In spring, the surface soils, from the top of the hill slope to lower down, had a good water content of about 0.4 m3 m3 due to snow melt; xylem water potentials in trees were all low (around 0.2 MPa); and foliage 3H was also relatively low (at about 5  103 Bq L1). By well into summer, the surface soils had dried by about a factor of 2 and the trees at the top of the hill slope had increased their water potential up to about 1.75 MPa, indicating greater stress. These plants had also retained their earlier foliage 3H concentrations. The trees at the bottom of the slope, however, had onlymildly increased their water potential (to about 0.35 MPa) but their foliage 3H had increased dramatically tomore than 1106 Bq L1. The trees had shifted their water source to the deeper, but relatively more accessible, seepage from theMaxey Flats sitewhichwas unavailable to the plants higher up the hill slope. The plants at LFBGmay be similarly switching their water source in response to rainfall inputs and thereby temporarily changing their access to any potential sub-surface seepage plumes from the trenches.600 1 Eu 1 Le 1 Sy 1 Sy 2 500 400 300 200 100 0 r tree details) from the standard set on each sampling date. The dotted line for Eu 1 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Bq/l J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558 555To test this hypothesis, daily data of rainfall less pan evaporation measured at Lucas Heights were used to estimate a local value for the cumulative rainfall deficit as a surrogate for potential infiltra- tion. The effects of daily temperature ranges over the period of the study were also assessed. These were compared with the percentage shift in transpirate 3H activity concentration from one sample to the next for each branch over the entire sampling period. Percentages were used rather than the absolute differences to normalise samples to a common baseline. It should be noted that some data were excluded from these analyses, as follows: Two branches (Le 1.2 and Sy 2.2) had too few points with successive 3H measures to allow for accurate regression analysis; branch Eu 1.1 had consistently low activity concentrations at less than twice the background and hence was prone to excessive variability due to counting uncertainty; and one branch (Ac 2.1) died soon after final sampling and hence could be considered to have potentially abnormal water use patterns. Initial observations showed no direct relationship between the shift in transpirate 3H and daily temperatures, rainfall events orA -5 -4 -3 -2 y = -0.15x + 0.01 R2 = 0.18 B -5 -4 -3 -2 y = -0.26x - 0.33 R2 = 0.46 RaiRnfaailnl fdaell fdiceitfi c–i t1 144 dda ley Fig. 4. Correlations of the % shift in transpirate tritium activity concentration in individual evaporation at ANSTO (1.6 km S) for the preceding 14 days. A, larger trees: Eucalyptus panic and Acacia obtusifolia, Banksia serrata and Leptospermum polygalifolium. Tritium shift % T ri ti u m S h i ft % cumulative rainfall deficit, however there was some indication that a leading average rainfall deficit (representing potential infiltra- tion), estimated over some days or weeks, may be having an effect. Modellers within the IAEA BIOMASS Program Tritium Working Group also agreed that the balance between rainfall and evapora- tion, together with mechanical dispersion processes in soil, were key factors in the transport of 3H through the unsaturated layer above a contaminated zone (IAEA, 2003). Fig. 4 a and b show the trends for shifts in transpirate 3H concentrations for larger and smaller trees, respectively, using an arbitrary lag in the potential infiltration of 14 days. The correlations are not signi cant (r2fi ¼ 0.18 and 0.46 respectively), however a consistent trend was observable. To determine an optimum lag period, the transpirate 3H activity concentrations were correlated with net rainfall deficit over daily time steps from 1 to 90 days using a modelling approach described in Venables and Ripley (2002). Fig. 5 shows the results of the correlation modelling. Values around zero imply poor or no correlation between the number of days over which approximate infiltration was calculated and the measured shift in transpirate 3H2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -1 0 1 2 -0.5 -1 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -1 0 1 2 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 a ledaindgi nagv earvaegrea g(me m(m) m) branches between successive samples at LFBG with the cumulative rainfall minus pan ulata and Syncarpia glomulifera; B, smaller trees and shrubs; Acacia longifolia longifolia 556 J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558 1.2 Ac1.1 0.8 Le1.1 0.4 Ac2.2 Ac2.3 0 Ac2.4 -0.4 Ac2.5 Ba1.1 -0.8 Ba1.2 -1.2 Sy1.1 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 Sy2.1 Preceeding number of days Fig. 5. Correlations for the % shift in tritium activity concentrations between sequential samples for individual branches at LFBG with the rainfall deficit at ANSTO (1.6 km S) over the number of days prior to sampling. 350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 Correlation coefficient q . L activity concentration. Negative values imply an inverse relation- ship (i.e. 3H activity concentrations decrease with increasing rain- fall) and the converse is true for positive values. It is apparent from Fig. 5 that therewas considerable noise in the data. A simple correlation using rainfall deficit alone did not fully explain temporal shifts in 3H activity concentration in transpirate at LFBG, remembering also that the meteorological station was approximately 1.6 km distant from the sampled trees. Measuring additional parameters at the time of sampling, such as soil moisture content, air pressure, relative humidity etc. may have provided more modelling power to assist in evaluation. However, some points of consistency were discerned. Firstly, most of the correlations were negative. This supports the hypothesis that rainfall infiltration into surface soil was dilu- ting the activity concentration of 3H in the active root zones. Secondly, the correlation curves tend to flatten off after about 40 cumulative days, suggesting that additional information after that time did not add anything to improve the interpretation. Thirdly, there was considerable variation in correlation between branches in the period up to about 10 days. This implied that short- term variability in rainfall and evaporation had an imprecise effect on transpirate 3H shift. Experimental studies with sunflower and tobacco plants showed that equilibrium between the 3H in the solution to which their roots were exposed and the stems and petioles of mature leaves was reached within half a day (Raney and Vaadia, 1965). Citrus seedlings, being slightly larger plants at 1e2 years old, required up to 40 h to achieve equilibrium between a 3H enriched nutrient solution bathing the roots and their leaves (Mantell et al., 1979). It follows that the larger trees sampled in this study will take somewhat longer times for such transfer to take place. All the literature sited inSection3.1 (above) also indicated that therewas a delay inmass transport ofwaterwithin the tree in that it took fromdays toweeks betweenuptake from roots and subsequent transpiration. In addition, there is the time required for the infil- tratingwater to reach andmix in the root zonebefore anyuptake can occur. Hence, it is not unexpected that recent, short-term, rainfall patterns will not be consistently reflected in the transpirate. Lastly from Fig. 5, there was a period from approximately two to three weeks where most of the correlations were more stronglyTable 1 Tritium activity concentrations in tree transpirate collected over or adjacent to the trenches at LFBG, or in nearby transects. Sample set Average  S.E. n Range Genera (Bq L1) (Bq L1) sampled Standard 116  11 100 0e667 See text North East 2  1 13 0e10 Eucalyptus & Transect Acacia West 12  3 11 4e29 Eucalyptus & Transect Syncarpia South East 23  7 7 0e52 Eucalyptus & Transect Acacianegative. This implied that a lag period in this range was optimal and, hence, the data in Fig. 4 were reasonable estimates for this site. 3.3. Spatial variability in transpirate tritium activity concentrations 3.3.1. Differences between the standard set and nearby transects Average transpirate 3H activity concentrations for the standard set of trees and for the nearby transects indicated in Fig. 1b are presented in Table 1. It is quite clear that significantly higher average activity concentrationswere registered over the trenches than in the nearby transects. The transect to the north and east was at background levels. There was no evidence of any near-surface seepage plume in that direction. The transect to the west was also low but slightly higher on average than the northern transect. The LFBG is bordered by a disused landfill site in that direction which exhibited leachate 3H levels ranging from 240 to 415 Bq L1 in late 2008 (Hughes et al., 2010). It is possible than the minimal transpired 3H levels detected could have been the result of seepage from the landfill into the LFBG instead of seepage from the trenches in this case. The transect to the south east follows a natural drainage line (Fig.1b)where elevated 3H levels havebeen found in surface runoff (Hughes et al., 2010). Hence, the slightly higher values again in that case may well have been associated with surface expression of a near-surface seepage plume or runoff from the LFBG trenches. However, the values were still much lower than those detected in the standard set and hence the seepage, if it existed, was negligible or mixed with lower activity waters. It should be noted that in none of the transectswas there any signi 3ficant difference in transpirate H activity concentration between the different species that were sampled. At the time of sampling, there was another potential nearby source of 3H, theHIFAR research reactor approximately 1.6 km to the south (Fig.1a), that may have contributed some activity by localised atmospheric transport, particularly to the south east transect. This is particularly so as it is reported that atmospheric 3H uptake by plants tends to be themost commonexposure pathway (Boyer et al., 2009). Whilst 3H in rainfall at the Lucas Heights meteorological station averaged14Bq L1 over the period 2004e2008 (Hughes et al., 2010), during the period of transpirate sampling the rainfall weighted average 3H was 2.5 Bq L1 following the final shutdown of HIFAR in the first quarter of 2007. To assess the atmospheric contribution to transpirate, a transect fromHIFAR to thenorth through the LFBGwas sampled twice. The results are shown in Fig. 6. The local effect of HIFAR was clearly evident with transpirate levels well in excess of those observed in rainfall; however its100.0 50.0 0.0 -50.0 Northing Fig. 6. Tritium activity concentrations in transpirate samples collected on two days along a transect from HIFAR through the LBFG and further north. The standard tree set is indicated by open symbols. B HI F A R LF B G TR E NC H E S HEATHCOTE RO A D HOL S WO R T HY J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558 557influence declined to background before the LFBG was reached. Background levels were re-established to the north of the trenches before the Heathcote Road samples. Therefore the standard set of samples clearly showed the effect of 3H sourced from the trenches. In addition, samples near the trenches showed an increase above background which implied some movement, albeit small, into the wider environment at LFBG from either the LFBG trenches or the adjacent Harringtons Quarry landfill. This was reinforced by recent data acquired as a consequence of drilling a series of shallow core holes with depths of 3e5m surrounding and between the trenches, including one transect of 6 core holes perpendicular to the trenches at distances of w1 to w15 m. The core extraction work indicated a shallow, perched, saturated zone within 2e3.5 m of the ground surface in the area of the trenches and corresponding approxi- mately with the base of the burial trenches. Samples were gathered from seepage waters that collected in the core holes over the 24-h period immediately after drilling in Aug 2009. The 3H concentra- tions in the transect waters were up tow2.7  104 Bq L1 closest to the trenches. However, they declined quickly to <5  103 Bq L1 within 15 m. 3.3.2. Groundwater interactions Four sets of measurements of groundwater 3Hmade in 1975 and 1976 by Isaacs and Mears (1977) showed that the highest levels (>2  105 Bq L1) occurred in samples taken from shallow bore- holes located between the two sets of trenches, and this was confirmed during the Aug 2009 core hole sampling. Tritiated water has beenmeasured in groundwater samples from LFBG twice yearly since 1975 as part of the routine monitoring program and an analysis of the results has been reported by Hughes et al. (2010). The monitoring indicated that 3H in groundwater has been slowly dispersing from the trenched area, particularly towards the north and south, broadly following the surface gradient. The current 3H maxima are from 3 to 4  104 Bq L1 as indicated by the Aug 2009 sampling of core holes. The potential for capillary rise of 3H contaminated groundwater in the clay soils of the LFBGwould be in the order of 10m (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981, Tables 6e1) allowing 3H to be transported vertically up the soil profile during dry periods. This vertical transport process will mediate any potential tree interaction with the gro- undwater plume.500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Interpolated groundwater tritium (Bq/L) Average Individual samples Trendline excl Sy 2 high value All data trendline Fig. 7. Transpirate vs groundwater 3H at LFBG. Groundwater values were estimated from interpolation of AugeNov 2009 core hole and groundwater samples. The rela- tionship between transpirate (TR) and groundwater (GW) for all data is H3TR ¼ 0.017 H3GW þ 29.0 (r2 ¼ 0.24). When the highest Sy 2 data point is removed the correlation improves and the intercept becomes closer to zero: H3 ¼ 0.021 H3TR GW þ 4.9 (r2 ¼ 0.51). Measured transpirate tritium (Bq/L) Sy 2 Eu 1 Ac 1 Ba 1 Le 1 Ac 2 Sy 1Given that the locations of the available groundwater boreholes do not correspond with those of the tree samples, groundwater 3H values from the Aug 2009 core hole samples and selected OcteNov 2009 borehole samples were interpolated to estimate the groundwater 3H concentration at the seven standard transpirate sampling locations. The interpolated groundwater values are plotted against the transpirate values in Fig. 7. Soil water samples collected using lysimeters to a depth of w30 cm at three locations at the LFBG were reported to have 3H levels ranging from 28 to 253 Bq L1 (Hughes et al., 2010), similar to those found in tran- spirate in this study; however their locations were not directly comparable with the vegetation sampled in this study and were intentionally located in surface seepage zones. The 3H activity concentrations in the transpirate (and lysimeter) samples were substantially less than those measured in waters collected from boreholes across the LFBG site. Average transpirate concentrations from individual trees and sampling dates ranged from 0 to 91% of the estimated groundwater concentration, with an overall average of 4.5% and median of 2%. However, a number of factors were likely to influence the relationship between tran- spirate and groundwater, such as recent rainfall, depth to ground- water, rooting depth and the presence of preferential flow pathways. Similarly, there were simplifications made in interpola- tion of the groundwater at the transpirate sampling points including assumed linear variation in activity (unlikely to be true), ignoring differences in bore depth and bore construction, variation in standing water levels and poorly defined 3H distribution in the trenches. Despite that, an overall positive correlation between groundwater and transpirate 3H can be seen in Fig. 7 with an r2 value of 0.24. Syncarpia 2, however, exhibited a much higher average transpirate to groundwater ratio, which may indicate that the groundwater concentrationwas underestimated at this location and/or that preferential flow pathways or root locations close to the trenches provided the tree roots access to more concentrated groundwater. When the highest data point from Sy 2 is excluded the r2 increases to 0.51 and the intercept comes nearer to zero. Nonetheless, the observation that all of the average transpirate values were less than any interpolated groundwater value points to the fact that the soil water being accessed by the plants is a mixed source, likely to comprise rainwater diluted seepage. This is consistent with the observation, above, that the transpirate 3H concentrations tended to respond inversely to rainfall intensity. 4. Conclusions Transpired water from trees growing over, or adjacent to, the low-level nuclear waste disposal trenches at the LFBG contained activity concentrations of 3H that were significantly higher (up to a factor of about 70 times) than local background levels. There was a correlation between proximity to likely seepage water plumes and 3H activity concentration in transpired water. The levels in transpirate were substantially lower than grou- ndwater concentrations measured across the site (by a median factor of 50). The observed shifts in tree transpirate 3H concentra- tion between sampling periods, together with local meteorological observations, indicate that the soil water within the active root zones comprises a mixture of seepage and rainfall infiltration. The degree of mixing was variable given that the soil water activity concentrations were heterogeneous at a scale equivalent to the effective rooting volume of the trees. In addition, water taken up by roots was not well mixed within the trees. Whilst the nearby HIFAR research reactor was a source of atmospheric 3H and local fallout over the period of sampling, its influence reduced to background within the distance to the LFBG. However, the low-level waste at the LFBG had a slight, but 558 J.R. Twining et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 102 (2011) 551e558measurable, effect on transpirate 3H activity concentrations beyond the disposal trenches. Those effects declined rapidly with distance to be approaching, or at, background levels within 10s of metres from the trenches. It is possible that some 3H contribution may be coming from an alternative low-level source, the adjacent landfill to the west of the trenches, but if so, it is minimal. Acknowledgements This work was carried out collaboratively under the supportive Project leadership of Dr Timothy Payne. A number of technical and analytical staff also provided valuable assistance. These particularly include Nicola Creighton, Michelle Vine, Emmy Hoffmann, Barbora Neklapilova, Robert Chisari, Carla Howe and Kerry Wilsher. The authors appreciated the cooperation of the Waste Operations Section at ANSTO in permitting access to the site and other oper- ational staff (AFP and Site Maintenance) for their consideration of our field activities. References Amano, H., Garten, C.T., 1991. Uptake of tritium by plants from atmosphere and soil. Environ. Int. 17, 23e29. Amano, H., Garten, C.T., 1992. Seasonal trends in environmental tritium concen- trations in a small forest adjacent to a radioactive waste storage area. Fusion Technol. 21, 700e705. Boyer, C., Vichot, L., Fromm,M., Losset, Y., Tatin-Froux, F., Guetat, P., Badot, P.M., 2009. Tritium in plants: a review of current knowledge. Environ. Exp. Bot. 67, 34e51. Canadell, J., Jackson, R.B., Ehleringer, J.R., Mooney, H.A., Sala, O.E., Schulze, E.D., 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108, 583e595. Clark, G.H., 2003. Updated Analysis of the Lucas Heights Climatology 1991e2003. ANSTO/E754 available from: http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/255. Eichrom Technologies Incorporated, 1996. OTW02 Analytical Procedures: Tritium in Water. Eichrom Technologies Inc., Darien IL. Evenden, W.G., Sheppard, S.C., Killey, R.W.D., 1998. Carbon-14 and tritium in plants of a wetland containing contaminated groundwater. Appl. Geochem. 13, 17e21. Guswa, A.J., 2008. The influence of climate on root depth: a carbon cost-benefit analysis. Water Resour. Res. 44, W02427. doi:10.1029/2007WR006384.Hoffmann, E.L., Loosz, T., Ferris, J.M., 2008. Environmental and Effluent Monitoring at ANSTO Sites, 2006e2007 ANSTO Report E-762. Holtz,R.D.,Kovacs,W.D.,1981.AnIntroductiontoGeotechnicalEngineering.Prentice-Hall Inc,NJ. Hughes, C.E., Cendon, D.I., Harrison, J.J., Hankin, S., Johansen, M.P., Payne, T.E., Vine, M., Collins, R.N., Hoffmann, E.L., Loosz, T., 2010. Movement of a tritium plume in shallow groundwater at a legacy low-level radioactive waste disposal site in eastern Australia. J. Environ. Radioact.. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.05.009. IAEA, 2003. Modelling the environmental transport of tritium in the vicinity of long term atmospheric and sub-surface sources. Report of the Tritium Working Group of the Biosphere Modelling and Assessment (BIOMASS) Programme, Theme 3. IAEA, Vienna. http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/ Biomass3_web.pdf. ICRP 108, 2008. Environmental Protection: The Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants. International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 108. Approved by the Commission in October 2008. Isaacs, S., Mears, K., December 1977. A Study of the Burial Ground Used for Radioactive Waste at the Little Forest Area Near Lucas Heights, New South Wales Australian Atomic Energy Commission Report AAEC/E427. Jordan, C.F., Kline, J.R., 1977. Transpiration of trees in a tropical rainforest. J. Appl. Ecol. 14 (3), 853e860. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2402816. Kline, J.R., Reed, K.L., Waring, R.H., 1976. Field measurement of transpiration in Douglas fir. J. Appl. Ecol. 13 (1), 273e283. Mantell, A., Monselise, S.P., Goldschmidt, E.E., 1979. Movement of tritiated water through young citrus plants. J. Exp. Bot. 30 (114), 155e164. Mathew, G., Vasu, K., Vamadevan, V.K., Wahid, P.A., 1988. Measurement of tran- spiration rate in coconut palm with tritiated water: tritium profile in coconut crown. J. Nucl. Agric. Biol. 17, 110e112. McColl, J.G., 1969. Soileplant relations in a Eucalyptus forest on the south coast of New South Wales. Ecology 50 (3), 354e362. Raney, F., Vaadia, Y., 1965. Movement and distribution of HTO in tissue water and vapour transpired by shoots of Helianthus and Nicotiana. Plant Physiol. 40, 383e388. Specht, R.L., Rayson, P., 1957. Dark Island Heath (Ninety-Mile Plain, south Australia). III. The root systems. Aust. J. Bot. 5, 103e114. Stringer, J.W., Kelisz, P.J., Volpe, J.A., 1989. Deep tritiated water uptake and pre-dawn xylem water potentials as indicators of vertical rooting extent in a Quercus- Carya forest. Can. J. For. Res. 19, 627e631. Twining, J.R., 1994. Measurement of Tritiated Water Transpiration from Tree Leaves Following Root Injection. Proc SPERA Biennial Workshop. ANU, Canberra. Twining, J., Harrison, J., Vine, M., Creighton, N., Neklapilova, B., Hoffmann, E., 2009. Analytical Method Development for Tritium in Tree Transpirate from the Little Forest Burial Ground. Institute for Environmental Research. ANSTO, NMESP/ TN1.p. 19. Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, Fourth Ed. Springer ScienceþBusiness Media, ISBN 978-0-387-95457-8.