Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/2333
Title: | Comparison of LaBr3 : Ce and LaCl3 : Ce with NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors |
Authors: | Alexiev, D Mo, L Prokopovich, DA Smith, ML Matuchova, M |
Keywords: | Cadmium compounds Cerium Semiconductor detectors Zinc tellurides Scintillation counters Lanthanum compounds |
Issue Date: | Jun-2008 |
Publisher: | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
Citation: | Alexiev, D., Mo, L., Prokopovich, D. A., Smith, M. L., & Matuchova, M. (2008). Comparison of LaBr3 : Ce and LaCl3 : Ce with NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 55(3), 1174-1177. doi:10.1109/TNS.2008.922837 |
Abstract: | Energy resolution and detection efficiency were compared between new scintillators, lanthanum bromide (LaBr3:Ce) and lanthanum chloride (LaCl3:Ce) with conventional detectors, sodium iodide NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT). The study has shown that LaBr3:Ce and LaCl3:Ce scintillator detectors provided by Saint-Gobain offer better resolution than NaI(Tl) detector. LaBr3:Ce and LaCl3:Ce detectors could resolve some closely spaced peaks from 133Ba and 152Eu, which Na(I) could not. LaBr3:Ce has slightly better resolution and higher efficiency than LaCl3:Ce. An overall advantage of LaBr3:Ce and LaCl3:Ce detectors over NaI(Tl) and CZT has been discussed. The intrinsic activity of LaBr3:Ce is also demonstrated in this study. © 2008, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
Gov't Doc #: | 2532 |
URI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2008.922837 http://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/2333 |
ISSN: | 0018-9499 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.