Browsing by Author "Scorgie, Y"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemLower Hunter particle characterisation study 1st progress report(Office of Environment and Heritage and Environment Protection Authority, 2014-07) Hibberd, MF; Keywood, MD; Cohen, DD; Stelcer, E; Scorgie, Y; Thompson, S; Rivett, KThe Lower Hunter Particle Characterisation Study was commissioned by the NSW Environment Protection Authority in 2013 to investigate the composition and major sources of particle pollution in the Lower Hunter. The study was conducted by scientists from the former Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH), CSIRO and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), with oversight from the NSW Ministry of Health, and completed in 2016. Focusing on very small particles, invisible to the human eye, which can be inhaled and can pass through the throat and nose and into the lungs, the study aimed to determine the composition and major sources of fine particles (PM2.5) and coarse particles (PM2.5-10). Fine particles were monitored at four sites, including two sites representative of regional population exposures (Newcastle, Beresfield) and two sites near the Port of Newcastle (Mayfield and Stockton). Coarse particles were monitored at Mayfield and Stockton, the two sites near the Port of Newcastle.
- ItemLower Hunter particle characterisation study 3rd progress report (Spring)(Office of Environment and Heritage and Environment Protection Authority, 2015-01-01) Hibberd, MF; Keywood, MD; Cohen, DD; Stelcer, E; Scorgie, Y; Thompson, SThe Lower Hunter Particle Characterisation Study was commissioned by the NSW Environment Protection Authority in 2013 to investigate the composition and major sources of particle pollution in the Lower Hunter. The study was conducted by scientists from the former Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH), CSIRO and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), with oversight from the NSW Ministry of Health, and completed in 2016. Focusing on very small particles, invisible to the human eye, which can be inhaled and can pass through the throat and nose and into the lungs, the study aimed to determine the composition and major sources of fine particles (PM2.5) and coarse particles (PM2.5-10). Fine particles were monitored at four sites, including two sites representative of regional population exposures (Newcastle, Beresfield) and two sites near the Port of Newcastle (Mayfield and Stockton). Coarse particles were monitored at Mayfield and Stockton, the two sites near the Port of Newcastle. © 2015 CSIRO and Office of Environment and Heritage
- ItemLower Hunter particle characterisation study appendices to the final report to the NSW Environment Protection Authority(Office of Environment and Heritage and Environment Protection Authority, 2016-04-01) Hibberd, MF; Keywood, MD; Selleck, PW; Cohen, DD; Stecler, E; Scorgie, Y; Chang, LThe Lower Hunter Particle Characterisation Study was commissioned by the NSW Environment Protection Authority in 2013 to investigate the composition and major sources of particle pollution in the Lower Hunter. The study was conducted by scientists from the former Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH), CSIRO and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), with oversight from the NSW Ministry of Health, and completed in 2016. Focusing on very small particles, invisible to the human eye, which can be inhaled and can pass through the throat and nose and into the lungs, the study aimed to determine the composition and major sources of fine particles (PM2.5) and coarse particles (PM2.5-10). Fine particles were monitored at four sites, including two sites representative of regional population exposures (Newcastle, Beresfield) and two sites near the Port of Newcastle (Mayfield and Stockton). Coarse particles were monitored at Mayfield and Stockton, the two sites near the Port of Newcastle.
- ItemLower Hunter particle characterisation study Final Report to the NSW Environment Protection Authority(Office of Environment and Heritage and Environment Protection Authority, 2016-04-01) Hibberd, MF; Keywood, MD; Selleck, PW; Cohen, DD; Stelcer, E; Scorgie, Y; Chang, LThe Lower Hunter Particle Characterisation Study (LHPCS) provides details about the composition and major sources of PM2.5 (fine airborne particles)and PM2.5-10(coarse airborne particles). Measurements were made for one year from March 2014 to February 2015 at two air quality monitoring stations representative of regional population exposures (Newcastle and Beresfield) and two stations near the Port of Newcastle (Mayfield and Stockton). Annual average PM2.5 concentrations were very similar at Newcastle, Mayfield and Beresfield (6.4–6.7 μg m-3) but about 40% higher at Stockton (9.1 μg m-3). The higher levels at Stockton were mainly due to both more sea salt and to the primary ammonium nitrate, which was only detected at Stockton. The ammonium nitrate, which contributed on average 19% of the PM2.5 mass (and ~40% in winter), was identified as very likely to be due to primary emissions from Orica’s ammonium nitrate manufacturing facility on Kooragang Island. Other than the ammonium nitrate, PM2.5 composition and sources were found to be fairly similar across the four sites. Key results on the sources and their contributions are: fresh sea salt particles: 24% at Newcastle, decreasing to 13% at Beresfield; pollutant-aged sea salt: ~23% at all sites; this is sea salt reacted with industrial, commercial, road and non-road transport emissions from local and regional sources; wood smoke: 15% at Beresfield, decreasing to 6% at Stockton; secondary ammonium sulfate: ~10% at all sites; soil dust: ~10% at all sites; vehicles: ~10% at three sites, but only 5% at Stockton; industry factors: ~12% at three sites but 24% at Stockton; mixed shipping/industry: ~3% at all sites; nitrate: 19% ammonium nitrate at Stockton and secondary nitrate at other sites (6-11%). On an annual average basis, there is an approximately 50:50 split between primary and secondary particles at three sites (Newcastle, Beresfield and Mayfield) and a 65:35 split at Stockton because of the significant contribution from the primary ammonium nitrate. PM2.5-10 composition and sources were only determined at the stations near the Port of Newcastle. The 2½ times higher annual average PM2.5-10 concentration at Stockton (21.5 μg m-3) than at Mayfield (8.3 μg m-3) was found to be mainly due to a much higher contribution by fresh sea salt particles at Stockton. The PM2.5-10 factors and their contributions were identified as: fresh sea salt: 13.6 μg m-3 at Stockton, 3.3 μg m-3 at Mayfield industry plus pollutant-aged sea salt: 2.4 μg m-3 at both sites light-absorbing carbon: 2.2 μg m-3 at Stockton, 0.9 μg m-3 at Mayfield soil: 2.3 μg m-3 at Stockton, 1.2 μg m-3 at Mayfield bioaerosol: 1.1 μg m-3 at Stockton, 0.5 μg m-3 at Mayfield. Most PM2.5-10 particles are primary particles or physical combinations of primary emissions, but there is evidence of chemical reactions in the pollutant-aged sea salt factor. Coal particles could contribute up to 10% of PM2.5-10 particles. Further investigations are needed to clarify the contribution of coal.
- ItemSources of particulate matter in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia(Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 2019-12-18) Keywood, MD; Hibberd, MF; Selleck, PW; Desservattaz, M; Cohen, DD; Stelcer, E; Atanacio, AJ; Scorgie, Y; Chang, LExposure to particulate matter results in adverse health outcomes, especially in sensitive members of the community. Many communities that co-exist with industry are concerned about the perceived impact of emissions from that industry on their health. Such concerns have resulted in two studies in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales, Australia. The chemical composition of samples of particulate matter, collected over two 12-month sampling periods (2012 and 2014–2015) at six sites in the Hunter Valley and across two size fractions (PM2.5 and PM2.5–10) were input to a receptor model to determine the source of particulate matter influencing particle composition at the sites. Fourteen factors were found to contribute to particle mass. Of these, three source profiles common to all sites, size fractions, and sampling periods were sea salt, industry-aged sea salt and soil. Four source profiles were common across all sites for PM2.5 including secondary sulphate, secondary nitrate, mixed industry/vehicles, and woodsmoke. One source profile (other biomass smoke) was only identified in PM2.5 at Singleton and Muswellbrook, two source profiles (mixed industry/shipping and vehicles) were only identified in PM2.5 at Newcastle, Beresfield, Mayfield, and Stockton, and one source (primary nitrate) was only identified at Stockton in PM2.5. Three sources (bioaerosol, light absorbing particles (coal dust), and industry) were only identified in the PM2.5–10 size fraction at Mayfield and Stockton. The contribution of the soil factor to PM2.5 mass was consistent across the sites, while the fresh sea salt factor decreased with distance from the coast from 23% at Stockton to 3% at Muswellbrook, and smoke increased with distance from the coast. Primary industry was greatest at Stockton (due to the influence of ammonium nitrate emitted from a prilling tower) and lowest inland at Muswellbrook. In general, primary emissions across the sites accounted for 30% of the industry sources. The largest contribution to PM2.5 was from secondary sources at all sites except at Muswellbrook, where woodsmoke and industry sources each made an equal contribution of 40%. In general, secondary reactions accounted for approximately 70% of the industry source, although at Stockton, with the presence of the prilling tower, this split was 50% primary and 50% secondary and at Muswellbrook, the split was 20% primary and 80% secondary. These findings add to the evidence base required to inform policies and programs that will improve air quality in the Hunter Valley. © 2019 by the Authors
- ItemVisualising the relationships between synoptic circulation type and air quality in Sydney, a subtropical coastal-basin environment(Wiley Online Library, 2016-05-20) Jiang, N; Scorgie, Y; Hart, M; Riley, ML; Crawford, J; Beggs, PJ; Edwards, GC; Chang, L; Salter, D; Virgilo, GDOzone and particle pollution are of concern for the Sydney basin, in particular during warm months (November to March) when pollution levels can exceed national standards. Previous studies on the relationship between synoptic circulation and air quality focused on high pollution days or aggregated air quality conditions over the region as a whole. This study provides both temporal and spatial analyses of the synoptic processes affecting warm-month ozone and particle pollution in Sydney. A warm-month synoptic catalogue was developed by applying the self-organising map method to the NCEP/NCAR geopotential height reanalysis for south-east Australia. The catalogue was linked to mesoscale meteorological features such as drainage flows and sea breezes, and subsequently to the spatial variability in air quality across the Sydney basin. The typical synoptic types commonly associated with high or low ozone and PM10 levels, as well as variations in visibility, were identified. The results suggest that, due to Sydney's subtropical coastal-basin environment, the interaction between meso- and synoptic-scale features determine local air quality conditions in the region, rather than the synoptic conditions alone. Emissions from bushfires appear to have considerable impacts on the synoptic modulation to visibility and PM10 levels, with such impacts tending to be more at a local scale. In contrast, no comparable impacts were found for ozone pollution. For ozone and visibility, the probability for an exceedance day under some synoptic types varied considerably over time, implying that there might have been a shift in the role of synoptic modulation to local air quality associated with changes in air emissions profiles. This study provides a leap in our understanding of the relationship between synoptic circulation and air quality in a coastal-basin environment. The results are useful for improving air quality forecasting in Sydney, with the methodology developed readily applicable to similar regions elsewhere. © 2016, Royal Meteorological Society.