Browsing by Author "Korschinek, G"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Cosmic-ray exposure history of the Norton County enstatite achondrite
    (Wiley, 2011-01-28) Herzog, GF; Albrecht, A; Ma, P; Fink, D; Klein, J; Middleton, R; Bogard, DD; Nyquist, LE; Shih, CY; Garrison, DH; Reese, Y; Masarik, J; Reedy, RC; Rugel, G; Faestermann, T; Korschinek, G
    We report measurements of cosmogenic nuclides in up to 11 bulk samples from various depths in Norton County. The activities of 36Cl, 41Ca, 26Al, and 10Be were measured by accelerator mass spectrometry; the concentrations of the stable isotopes of He, Ne, Ar, and Sm were measured by electron and thermal ionization mass spectrometry, respectively. Production rates for the nuclides were modeled using the LAHET and the Monte Carlo N-Particle codes. Assuming a one-stage irradiation of a meteoroid with a pre-atmospheric radius of approximately 50 cm, the model satisfactorily reproduces the depth profiles of 10Be, 26Al, and 53Mn (<6%) but overestimates the 41Ca concentrations by about 20%. 3He, 21Ne, and 26Al data give a one-stage cosmic-ray exposure (CRE) age of 115 Ma. Argon-36 released at intermediate temperatures, 36Arn, is attributed to production by thermal neutrons. From the values of 36Arn, an assumed average Cl concentration of 4 ppm, and a CRE age of 115 Ma, we estimate thermal neutron fluences of 1–4 × 1016 neutrons cm−2. We infer comparable values from ε149Sm and ε150Sm. Values calculated from 41Ca and a CRE age of 115 Ma, 0.2–1.4 × 1016 neutrons cm−2, are lower by a factor of approximately 2.5, indicating that nearly half of the 149Sm captures occurred earlier. One possible irradiation history places the center of proto-Norton County at a depth of 88 cm in a large body for 140 Ma prior to its liberation as a meteoroid with a radius of 50 cm and further CRE for 100 Ma. © The Meteoritical Society, 2011
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evidence for recent interstellar 60Fe on Earth
    (Australian National University, 2019-09-09) Koll, D; Faestermann, T; Feige, J; Fifield, LK; Froehlich, MB; Hotchkis, MAC; Korschinek, G; Merchel, S; Panjkov, S; Pavetich, S; Tims, SG; Wallner, A
    Over the last 20 years the long-lived radionuclide 60Fe with a half-life of 2.6 Myr was shown to be an expedient astrophysical tracer to detect freshly synthesized stardust on Earth. The unprecedented sensitivity of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry for 60Fe at The Australian National University (ANU) and Technical University of Munich (TUM) allowed us to detect minute amounts of 60Fe in deep-sea crusts, nodules, sediments and on the Moon [1-5]. These signals, around 2-3 Myr and 6.5-9 Myr before present, were interpreted as a signature from nearby Supernovae which synthesized and ejected 60Fe into the local interstellar medium. Triggered by these findings, ANU and TUM independently analyzed recent surface material for 60Fe, deep-sea sediments and for the first time Antarctic snow, respectively [6, 7]. We find in both terrestrial archives corresponding amounts of recent 60Fe. We will present these discoveries, evaluate the origin of this recent influx and bring it into line with previously reported ancient 60Fe findings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sample preparation for AMS astrophysics projects – size does (not) matter
    (Australian National University, 2019-09-09) Merchel, S; Child, DP; Faestermann, T; Fröhlich, M; Gosler, R; Hotchkis, MAC; Koll, D; Korschinek, G; Pavetich, S; Wallner, A
    The determination of long-lived radionuclides by means of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is usually outstandingly successful when an interdisciplinary team comes together. The “heart” of AMS research is of course an accelerator equipped with sophisticated ion sources, analytical tools and detectors run by experienced and ambitious physicists. Setting-up and further developing AMS systems is one of the most interesting and challenging topics. The reputation to be reached here is the greatest uniqueness of analysis possible, lowest detection levels, and/or most reliable data world-wide. For sure, another primary pillar of AMS research is based on the questions addressed within fundamental and applied research. “How have supernovae explosions influenced Earth, our solar system and beyond?” or “How does the Earth’s surface and environment respond to earthquakes, climate change and anthropogenic influences?” are just two examples of high-quality studies. However, somehow in-between there are groups of hidden figures like people developing software for data analysis or performing the required chemical sample preparation for AMS. These often unacknowledged individuals do crucial work for the overall outcome of the studies. Chemists can spend weeks and months trying (and failing) on sample preparation before they find a “safe way” and start the actual work on the most valuable sample material, repeat all over again the same “recipe” for hundreds of samples, or train non-chemists the secrets of their successful recipes. Nevertheless, interdisciplinary AMS work can also be very exciting for a chemist: touching (and destroying) samples from outer space, the deep ocean or (currently) frozen places like Antarctica is quite thrilling. But at the end of the day, the whole AMS chemist’s work can be described as “reducing the sample matrix, other impurities and especially isobars to a level the AMS machine can handle while enriching the radionuclide of interest”. Starting materials for applications such as astrophysical research can be “orders of magnitude” different: a neutron-irradiated sample of 1 g tungsten powder, over 40 g of clay-rich material from the Cretaceous–Tertiary (K-T) boundary, 100 g of ultra-pure sodium iodide, or 500 kg of snow from Antarctica can cause totally different and sometimes unexpected problems in the chemistry lab. In general, smaller samples are not always easier to handle for example if they are chemically rather resistant or reactive. The cream of the crop of failure and success in a few AMS chemistry labs will be presented.